Effectiveness of 17-Alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone in the Prevention of Preterm Labour

Urooj, Uzma; Khan, Sumaira; Parveen, Shakeela; Shah, Sajid Ali

doi:10.51253/pafmj.v73i1.5314

Cited by 1 publication

(4 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The 42 included studies were conducted between 1983 and 2021 25–66 . Twenty-nine studies were published as journal articles, and the remaining 13 were PhD theses.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Seven (17%) studies on followership among health care clinicians were in the followership styles category (Table 2). 25–31 All the studies included in this category used a descriptive cross-sectional survey design. Kelley’s followership model 3 was used to identify the followership styles of health care clinicians in all included studies in this category except for 2 studies 25,28 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this subcategory, 6 descriptive studies 25–30 were used to determine the followership styles in the samples of health care clinicians.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the first level of identification, which accounted for 17% (n = 7) of all included papers, descriptive studies were used to identify health care clinicians’ followership, or both followership and leadership, styles or characteristics. These studies have shown that a predominant followership style in one country might differ from another country 25–30 . While this may be useful—particularly in health care sectors with diverse demographics, such as Saudi Arabia, where most of the health care providers are expatriates who come from a wide variety of educational, cultural, and linguistic backgrounds 67 —it does not tell us much about the impact of followership styles.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Followership in health care clinicians: a scoping review

Alanazi

Wiechula

Foley

2023

JBI Evidence Synthesis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this scoping review was to identify and map the existing literature on the current state of followership research in relation to health care clinicians.Introduction: Health care clinicians need to be flexible in switching between leader and follower roles, as appropriate, to advance patient care; however, much of the existing research has concentrated on leadership. Effective followership in health care organizations is necessary to enhance clinical team performance in order to improve patient safety and quality of care. This has led to recommendations to increase the amount of research on followership. It is therefore important to synthesize the available evidence on followership to identify what has been studied and to highlight the research gaps in this area.Inclusion criteria: Studies that involved health care clinicians (eg, physicians, nurses, midwives, allied health professionals) and were focused on the concept of followership (eg, conceptualization of followership, attitudes toward the role of followership) were included in the review. Any clinical health care practice setting where direct patient care is provided was included. The review considered studies with quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods designs; systematic reviews; and meta-analyses. Methods:The search was conducted in JBI Evidence Synthesis, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EPPI, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Epistemonikos databases. In addition, unpublished or gray literature was searched for in ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global and Google Scholar. No limits on the date or language were applied to the search. Data were extracted from the papers by 3 independent reviewers, and review findings are presented in tables, figures, and a narrative summary.Results: A total of 42 papers were included. In articles that researched followership in health care clinicians, 6 categories were identified: followership styles, followership impact, followership experience, followership features, assertive followership, and followership interventions. Several study types were employed to investigate followership among health care clinicians. Descriptive statistics were used to identify clinicians' followership/leadership styles and characteristics in 17% of the studies. Approximately 31% of the studies were qualitative and observational studies used to understand health care clinicians' roles, experiences, perceptions of followership, and barriers to effective followership. For 40% of the studies, an analytical approach was used to explore the impact of followership on individuals, organizations, and clinical practice. Approximately 12% of studies were interventional studies that examined the effectiveness of training and education in enhancing health care clinicians' followership knowledge and skills.Conclusions: While several aspects of followership among health care clinicians have been addressed, research is still lacking in some important areas, such as the impact of followership on clinical practice an...

show abstract

“…The 42 included studies were conducted between 1983 and 2021 25–66 . Twenty-nine studies were published as journal articles, and the remaining 13 were PhD theses.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this subcategory, 6 descriptive studies 25–30 were used to determine the followership styles in the samples of health care clinicians.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations