Effectiveness of a childhood obesity prevention programme delivered through schools, targeting 6 and 7 year olds: cluster randomised controlled trial (WAVES study)

Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of a school and family based healthy lifestyle programme (WAVES intervention) compared with usual practice, in preventing childhood obesity.DesignCluster randomised controlled trial.SettingUK primary schools from the West Midlands.Participants200 schools were randomly selected from all state run primary schools within 35 miles of the study centre (n=980), oversampling those with high minority ethnic populations. These schools were randomly ordered and sequentially invited to participate. 144 eligible schools were approached to achieve the target recruitment of 54 schools. After baseline measurements 1467 year 1 pupils aged 5 and 6 years (control: 28 schools, 778 pupils) were randomised, using a blocked balancing algorithm. 53 schools remained in the trial and data on 1287 (87.7%) and 1169 (79.7%) pupils were available at first follow-up (15 month) and second follow-up (30 month), respectively.InterventionsThe 12 month intervention encouraged healthy eating and physical activity, including a daily additional 30 minute school time physical activity opportunity, a six week interactive skill based programme in conjunction with Aston Villa football club, signposting of local family physical activity opportunities through mail-outs every six months, and termly school led family workshops on healthy cooking skills.Main outcome measuresThe protocol defined primary outcomes, assessed blind to allocation, were between arm difference in body mass index (BMI) z score at 15 and 30 months. Secondary outcomes were further anthropometric, dietary, physical activity, and psychological measurements, and difference in BMI z score at 39 months in a subset.ResultsData for primary outcome analyses were: baseline, 54 schools: 1392 pupils (732 controls); first follow-up (15 months post-baseline), 53 schools: 1249 pupils (675 controls); second follow-up (30 months post-baseline), 53 schools: 1145 pupils (621 controls). The mean BMI z score was non-significantly lower in the intervention arm compared with the control arm at 15 months (mean difference −0.075 (95% confidence interval −0.183 to 0.033, P=0.18) in the baseline adjusted models. At 30 months the mean difference was −0.027 (−0.137 to 0.083, P=0.63). There was no statistically significant difference between groups for other anthropometric, dietary, physical activity, or psychological measurements (including assessment of harm).ConclusionsThe primary analyses suggest that this experiential focused intervention had no statistically significant effect on BMI z score or on preventing childhood obesity. Schools are unlikely to impact on the childhood obesity epidemic by incorporating such interventions without wider support across multiple sectors and environments.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN97000586.

Descriptive epidemiology of energy expenditure in the UK: Findings from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey 2008 – 2015

“…Our results demonstrate that males accumulate higher overall levels of TEE and PAEE than females across all ages, a finding that is consistent with other British cohort studies investigating energy expenditure with objective methods [31][32][33][34] This finding highlights the role that absolute body size plays in the accumulation of absolute energy expenditure, but also underlines obesity's inverse association with physical activity energy expenditure. This relationship was apparent regardless of the measure of obesity and of the measure of physical activity, with those with higher absolute bodyfat levels and those in the highest FMI category accumulating less physical activity than slimmer counterparts.…”

Interventions aimed at preventing and reducing overweight/obesity among children and adolescents: a meta‐synthesis

“…This might seem logical as treatments tend to be given to those children who are already overweight and 'have more to lose'. Quite in line with our results, a recent evaluation of a comprehensive school-based and familybased obesity prevention program delivered through schools in the UK (112) found no significant effects regarding weight or physical activity. Their conclusion that interventions delivered through schools alone are not enough and that the wider societal context including the media and food industry need to take responsibility for childhood obesity is something the meta-synthesis presented here echoes.…”

Actual vs. Perceived Motor Competence in Children (8–10 Years): An Issue of Non-Veridicality

“…A pivotal meta-analysis highlighted that PA interventions dedicated to improving quantity of PA report little effect [15]. More recently, Adab et al [16] reported in a longitudinal study that a one-year school/community-based PA intervention had no effect on body mass index (BMI) z-scores at 15-or 30-months post-intervention, highlighting that communities and schools are unlikely to impact on the childhood obesity epidemic by incorporating only PA targeted interventions.…”