2011
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of a multi-disciplinary family-based programme for treating childhood obesity (The Family Project)

Abstract: Conflict of InterestThe authors declare that they have no competing interests, financial or non-financial. 2 ABSTRACTBackground / Objectives: To determine if a multi-component family focused

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Forty‐seven interventions met inclusion criteria (Fig. ), of which 31 (66%) demonstrated a significant positive effect on physical activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forty‐seven interventions met inclusion criteria (Fig. ), of which 31 (66%) demonstrated a significant positive effect on physical activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional initiatives to prevent further increases and reduce existing levels of sedentary behavior in mothers and children are crucial. Focusing PA promotion at the family-level could increase the public health impact and effectiveness of these interventions [61-63]. The success of these efforts will continue to be challenged by rapid urbanization, technological advances, and socioeconomic development, so PA policy and interventions must be cognizant of how these factors influence PA and inactivity patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the remaining five trials, the multicomponent intervention was not different from control conditions (Arauz Boudreau, Kurowski, Gonzalez, Dimond, & Oreskovic, 2013;McCallum et al, 2007;Wake et al, 2009), a standard care condition (Hughes et al, 2008), and child-only treatment (Bathrellou et al, 2010). In addition, BWL treatments have been tested in an additional 11 studies of children and adolescents (ages 6-18), with nine of those trials demonstrating the efficacy of the BWL treatment compared to control conditions (Coppins et al, 2011;Jiang, Xia, Greiner, Lian, & Rosenqvist, 2005;Mellin, Slinkard, & Irwin, 1987;Nemet et al, 2005;Nowicka, Hoglund, Pietrobelli, Lissau, & Flodmark, 2008;Reinehr et al, 2010), selfhelp conditions , written dietary advice (Weigel et al, 2008), standard care (Sabet Sarvestani, Jamalfard, Kargar, Kaveh, & Tabatabaee, 2009), and dietary advice usual care (Diaz, EsparzaRomero, Moya-Camarena, Robles-Sardin, & Valencia, 2010) conditions. In this age group, a BWL intervention with family involvement was found to be no different from a combined dietary and physical activity condition or waitlist control condition (Kitzman-Ulrich et al, 2009), and a brief family intervention (Steele et al, 2012).…”
Section: Behavioral Weight Loss Treatment With Family Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%