Effectiveness of a Multimodal Community Intervention Program to Prevent Suicide and Suicide Attempts: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Abstract

BackgroundMultilevel and multimodal interventions have been suggested for suicide prevention. However, few studies have reported the outcomes of such interventions for suicidal behaviours.MethodsWe examined the effectiveness of a community-based multimodal intervention for suicide prevention in rural areas with high suicide rates, compared with a parallel prevention-as-usual control group, covering a total of 631,133 persons. The effectiveness was also examined in highly populated areas near metropolitan cities (1,319,972 persons). The intervention started in July 2006, and continued for 3.5 years. The primary outcome was the incidence of composite outcome, consisting of completed suicides and suicide attempts requiring admission to an emergency ward for critical care. We compared the rate ratios (RRs) of the outcomes adjusted by sex, age group, region, period and interaction terms. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis and stratified by sex and age groups.FindingsIn the rural areas, the overall median adherence of the intervention was significantly higher. The RR of the composite outcome in the intervention group decreased 7% compared with that of the control group. Subgroup analyses demonstrated heterogeneous effects among subpopulations: the RR of the composite outcome in the intervention group was significantly lower in males (RR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.59–0.998, p = 0.0485) and the RR of suicide attempts was significantly lower in males (RR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.22–0.68, p = 0.001) and the elderly (RR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.17–0.71, p = 0.004). The intervention had no effect on the RR of the composite outcome in the highly populated areas.InterpretationOur findings suggest that this community-based multimodal intervention for suicide prevention could be implemented in rural areas, but not in highly populated areas. The effectiveness of the intervention was shown for males and for the elderly in rural areas.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00737165 UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000000460

National strategy for suicide prevention in Japan: Impact of a national fund on progress of developing systems for suicide prevention and implementing initiatives among local authorities

“…The national suicide‐prevention strategy should explore a standard package of programs to guide planning, implementation, and evaluation of the suicide‐prevention efforts with a sustained workforce among local authorities. We should note that the NOCOMIT‐J study, which has employed a package of suicide‐prevention programs in Japan from July 2006 to December 2009, reduced suicide rates in a rural area . The present study also indicated a positive association between a smaller population size and the establishment of a community network for suicide prevention.…”

Suicide prevention strategies in Japan: A 15-year review (1998–2013)

“…A recent study reports on a community-based multimodal intervention for suicide prevention in rural areas with high suicide rates in Japan. 30 As described in the revised GPSP of 2012, Japan's suicide prevention strategy should enhance evaluation and monitoring schemes.…”

Spatial and temporal evolution of the epidemic of charcoal-burning suicide in Japan

“…These measures consisted of mass education campaigns, expanded mental health screening, and improved training of health professionals in crisis intervention and postvention [40,41]. Ono et al evaluated the effectiveness of a community-based multimodal intervention for suicide prevention in Japan, and reported that the intervention was effective in rural areas, but not in highly populated areas [42]. One suggested reason was that adherence to the program in densely populated areas was relatively low, pointing to the challenges of implementing the intervention in urban areas.…”