Effectiveness of a web-based, individually tailored decision aid for depression or acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial

Simón, Daniela; Kriston, Levente; Wolff, Alessa von; Buchholz, Angela; Vietor, C; Hecke, Torsten; Loh, Andreas; Zenker, Matthias; Weiss, Mario; Härter, Martin

doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.10.009

Cited by 39 publications

(60 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ideally, this would require a large-scale randomised controlled trial wherein a patient-centred practice (e.g., shared decision making) is the focus of intervention [54].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Audiologist-patient communication profiles in hearing rehabilitation appointments

Meyer

Barr

Khan

et al. 2017

Patient Education and Counseling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Highlights Audiology consultations remain clinician-centred.  Three-quarters of appointments began with a biopsychosocial interaction.  All appointments ended with a biomedical interaction dominated by hearing aid talk.  Audiologist-patient communication was not associated with decision to trial HAs. Audiologist-patient communication in hearing rehabilitation 2 AbstractObjective. To profile the communication between audiologists and patients in initial appointments on a biomedical-psychosocial continuum; and explore the associations between these profiles and 1) characteristics of the appointment and 2) patients' decisions to pursue hearing aids.Methods. Sixty-three initial hearing assessment appointments were filmed and audiologistpatient communication was coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System. A hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted to profile audiologist-patient communication, after which regression modelling and Chi-squared analyses were conducted.Results. Two distinct audiologist-patient communication profiles were identified during both the history taking phase (46 = biopsychosocial profile, 15 = psychosocial profile) and diagnosis and management planning phase (45 = expanded biomedical profile, 11 = narrowly biomedical profile). Shorter appointments were significantly more likely to be associated with a narrowly biomedical interaction during the diagnosis and management planning phase. No significant associations were found between audiologist-patient communication profile and patients' decisions to pursue hearing aids. Conclusion.Initial audiology consultations appear to remain clinician-centred. Three quarters of appointments began with a biopsychosocial interaction; however, 80% ended with an expanded biomedical interaction.Practice Implications. Findings suggest that audiologists could consider modifying their communication in initial appointments to more holistically address the needs of patients.

show abstract

“…Ideally, this would require a large-scale randomised controlled trial wherein a patient-centred practice (e.g., shared decision making) is the focus of intervention [54].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Audiologist-patient communication profiles in hearing rehabilitation appointments

Meyer

Barr

Khan

et al. 2017

Patient Education and Counseling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Del Pazo et al used age range of 18 to 64, while Simons included patients with age range of 20 to 40. del Pazo, reported that significant reduction was reported by participants in pain and disability while positive behavioral changes were found in 9 month of follow up (del PozoCruz et al, 2013). On the other hand, Simons et al, reported the decision making was significantly improved in the participants who were in treatment arm (Simon et al, 2012).…”

Section: Acute Non-specific Painmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Two studies focused on the sub-acute non specific pain (Simon et al, 2012;del Pozo-Cruz et al, 2013). One study used video demonstration and other patients dialogue (Simon et al, 2012;del Pozo-Cruz et al, 2013).…”

Section: Acute Non-specific Painmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One study used video demonstration and other patients dialogue (Simon et al, 2012;del Pozo-Cruz et al, 2013). Del Pazo et al used age range of 18 to 64, while Simons included patients with age range of 20 to 40. del Pazo, reported that significant reduction was reported by participants in pain and disability while positive behavioral changes were found in 9 month of follow up (del PozoCruz et al, 2013).…”

Section: Acute Non-specific Painmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Internet-based interventions for pain management: A systematic review of randomised controlled trial (RCTs) conducted from 2010 to 2014

El-Metwally¹

2015

J. Public Health Epidemiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Limited access to pain management programs was identified as one of the hindering factors in pain treatment. Several internet-based interventions have been developed to improve accessibility. A systematic review of trials of such programs in 2010 documented a preliminary promising effect. A PubMed electronic search was used to identify a systematic randomized controlled trail (RCTs) published 1 January, 2010 to 4 November, 2014 that examined the effectiveness of internet-based pain management programs. The methodological vigorousness of trials was assessed by Jadad scoring system. Out of the 20 RCTs, 5 were on chronic pain, 2 were on acute non-specific pain, while 13 were on disease related pain (rheumatological and neurological diseases, burns, post-operative and cancerrelated). Most studies had moderate methodological quality and showed consistent results with respect to effectiveness of internet based programs in reduction of pain, improvement in functionality and psychological well-being. Whilst the current systematic review found a significant pain reduction attributed to internet-based pain interventions further, high-quality RCT are needed to confirm such promising findings.

show abstract

“…Perceived involvement (Hospitalnurses; Care information; Doctors) 37 -Patient Mixed sample (Bowersox et al, 2013) M e n t a l H e a l t h R e v i e w J o u r n a l (Hamann et al, 2006) Depression (Wills and Holmes-Rovner, 2003;Simon et al, 2012;LeBlanc et al, 2015) Dementia (Einterz et al, 2014) Children with ADHD (Brinkman et al, 2013) (Simon et al, 2012) 1 * For these instruments, that assess broader aspects of care than SDM, items about patient involvement/SDM were selected and treated as a psychometric scale (internal consistency reported).…”

Section: E N T a L H E A L T H R E V I E W J O U R N A Lmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement issues of shared decision making in mental health: challenges and opportunities

Perestelo-Pérez

Rivero‐Santana

Álvarez‐Pérez

et al. 2017

MHRJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Shared decision making (SDM) is a model of health care in which patients are involved in the decision-making process about their treatment, considering their preferences and concerns in a deliberative process with the health care provider. Many existing instruments assess the antecedents, process, or the outcomes of SDM. The purpose of this paper is to identify the SDM-related measures applied in a mental health context. Design/methodology/approach The authors performed a systematic review in several electronic databases from 1990 to October 2016. Studies that assessed quantitatively one or more constructs related to SDM (antecedents, process, and outcomes) in the field of mental health were included. Findings The authors included 87 studies that applied 48 measures on distinct SDM constructs. A large majority of them have been developed in the field of physical diseases and adapted or directly applied in the mental health context. The most evaluated construct is the SDM process in consultation, mainly by patients’ self-report but also by external observer measures, followed by the patients’ preferences for involvement in decision making. The most applied instrument was the Autonomy Preference Index, followed by the Observing Patient Involvement in Decision Making (OPTION) and the Control Preferences Scale (CPS). The psychometric validation in mental health samples of the instruments identified is scarce. Research limitations/implications The bibliographic search is comprehensive, but could not be completely exhaustive. Effort should be invested in the development of new SDM for mental health tools that will reflect the complexity and specific features of mental health care. Originality/value The authors highlight several limitations and challenges for the measurement of SDM in mental health care.

show abstract

Effectiveness of a web-based, individually tailored decision aid for depression or acute low back pain: A randomized controlled trial

Cited by 39 publications

References 23 publications

Audiologist-patient communication profiles in hearing rehabilitation appointments

Audiologist-patient communication profiles in hearing rehabilitation appointments

Internet-based interventions for pain management: A systematic review of randomised controlled trial (RCTs) conducted from 2010 to 2014

Measurement issues of shared decision making in mental health: challenges and opportunities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About