1980
DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1980.41.81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of an 84-day and a 60-day alcoholism treatment program.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this difference might be a function of time (i.e., five additional weeks during which to drop out), it may also represent a potential drawback of longer programs, particularly in those that make continuation in aftercare contingent on completion of an inpatient phase. Kish et al (1980) observed that alcoholic inpatients often feel ready for discharge and leave against medical advice after 3 to 4 weeks of treatment. Although an overall optimal length of treatment cannot be advocated since parametric investigation was not done, the present findings suggest that inpatient treatment as brief as 2 weeks can lead, on the average, to outcomes comparable to longer hospitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although this difference might be a function of time (i.e., five additional weeks during which to drop out), it may also represent a potential drawback of longer programs, particularly in those that make continuation in aftercare contingent on completion of an inpatient phase. Kish et al (1980) observed that alcoholic inpatients often feel ready for discharge and leave against medical advice after 3 to 4 weeks of treatment. Although an overall optimal length of treatment cannot be advocated since parametric investigation was not done, the present findings suggest that inpatient treatment as brief as 2 weeks can lead, on the average, to outcomes comparable to longer hospitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of randomized experimental studies have generally found no differences at outcome associated with length of stay (Mosher, Davis, Mulligan, & Iber, 1975;Page & Schaub, 1979;Stein, Newton, & Bowman, 1975). After their treatment program was administratively shortened from 84 days to 60 days, Kish, Ellsworth, and Woody (1980) found that at 6-month follow-up a higher percentage of patients in the shorter program reported drinking since discharge. However, there were no differences on a number of other outcome measures including frequency of drinking, daily alcohol consumption, change in alcohol consumption relative to pretreatment, and level of overall posttreatment adjustment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 There is also evidence to support the hypothesis that LOS may differentially impact abstinence versus engagement in other recovery activities, with increased abstinence rates yet no difference on other outcomes, including overall functioning post-treatment. 12,24,25 Aside from the high prevalence and mixed relapse rates among adolescents with psychiatric comorbidity, the interplay between psychiatric comorbidity and LOS as well as their impact on abstinence post-treatment is also relatively unknown. A prior study has examined the effect of a short-term treatment facility versus a long-term treatment facility and determined that there was no interaction between treatment type and comorbidity in outcome.…”
Section: Adolescent Treatment Outcomes 367mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• 2 studies − positive results, few relapses (Rhead JC et al 1977;Smith TL et al 1999) • 3 studies − negative results, increases relapses (Conrad KJ et al 1998;Swenson PR et al 1981;Olson RP et al 1981) • 8 studies − no significant changes in relapses (Potamianos G et al1986;Kish GB et al 1980;Sandahl C et al 1998;Glotzbach LD. 1984;Johnson FG.…”
Section: Fig 25 Studies On Naltrexone and Acamprosate For Relapse Prmentioning
confidence: 99%