2011
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of back school for treatment of pain and functional disability in patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract: The addition of back school was more effective than exercise and physical treatment modalities alone in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
49
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
49
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…De 25 pacientes inscritos no programa, 15 foram excluídos por: terem faltado mais de três vezes no período de intervenção (cinco indivíduos); presença de prolapso discal associado (quatro); presença de artrodese (dois); não finalizar o período de estudo (dois); presença de patologia neurológica associada (um); e dificuldade de compreensão (1).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…De 25 pacientes inscritos no programa, 15 foram excluídos por: terem faltado mais de três vezes no período de intervenção (cinco indivíduos); presença de prolapso discal associado (quatro); presença de artrodese (dois); não finalizar o período de estudo (dois); presença de patologia neurológica associada (um); e dificuldade de compreensão (1).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…A Organização Mundial de Saúde estima que 65 a 80% da população possui ou possuirá, um dia, quadro clínico de dor lombar (1), e 40% desses casos tornar--se-ão um problema crônico (2). A dor lombar, portanto, deve ser tratada como um problema de saúde pública por atingir níveis epidêmicos da população em geral, sendo importante fator de morbidade, incapacidade funcional, absenteísmo e diminuição da produtividade (3,4).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…According to the results of Sahin et al, [27] the mean score of the VAS in PTG was 7.16 with a standard deviation (SD) of 2.54 and the mean score of the VAS in CG was 5.72. [27] The sample size was based on a power of 80% (beta: 0.2). A p value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.…”
Section: Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[22] The functional status was evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). [23][24][25][26][27][28] and Istanbul Low Back Pain Disability Index (ILBP). [26] The ODI consists of 10 questions which assess the degree of pain, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, travel, and pain alteration, each scoring between 0 and 5.…”
Section: Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low back pain (LBP), a painful condition which affects the lumbar region of the spine in recent years has become a widespread condition [1]. It has been estimated that approximately 65-80% of the adult population had suffered from at least a LBP episode in their life [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%