2003
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.163.19.2337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of Bupropion Sustained Release for Smoking Cessation in a Health Care Setting

Abstract: In this actual practice setting, the combination of bupropion SR and minimal or moderate counseling was associated with 1-year quit rates of 23.6% to 33.2%. This suggests that existing health care systems can substantially decrease tobacco use rates among their enrollees if they provide these modest interventions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In nine bupropion effectiveness studies examined, subjects received extensive counselling with seven studies reporting weekly brief (15 minutes or less) face-to-face counselling from research assistants, trial nurses and counsellor/psychologists. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] However, Australian studies have shown that smokers enrolled in smoking cessation pharmacotherapies are unlikely to actively participate in counselling. 44,45 The weight of research suggests that counselling does increase successful quit rates among smokers, therefore, if the additional expenditure is being spent on pharmacotherapies the additional marginal expenditure on telephone counselling may be money well spent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In nine bupropion effectiveness studies examined, subjects received extensive counselling with seven studies reporting weekly brief (15 minutes or less) face-to-face counselling from research assistants, trial nurses and counsellor/psychologists. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] However, Australian studies have shown that smokers enrolled in smoking cessation pharmacotherapies are unlikely to actively participate in counselling. 44,45 The weight of research suggests that counselling does increase successful quit rates among smokers, therefore, if the additional expenditure is being spent on pharmacotherapies the additional marginal expenditure on telephone counselling may be money well spent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,21,22 Given this consensus, telephone counselling was selected as representative of counselling. 23,24 Telephone counselling has also been used with some success alongside pharmacotherapies including bupropion 25 and NRT patches 26 and is explicitly recommended in Australian treatment guidelines.…”
Section: Brief Advicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alere is the largest provider of telephone smoking cessation interventions in the United States, currently operating QLs for 28 states and numerous large health insurers and companies. This intervention met our criteria for a comparison intervention because (a) it follows Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) clinical practice guidelines for smoking cessation (Fiore et al, 2008); (b) it has demonstrated efficacy (Bush et al, 2012;Hollis et al, 2007;Swan et al, 2003); (c) its traditional CBT approach is mediated by psychological processes that are different from those of ACT, providing a rigorous test of the hypothesized mediator (Forman et al, 2007;Hayes et al, 1999); and (d) the intervention is equal in length to the ACT intervention. Sessions focus on assisting participants to develop a quit plan and teaching skills in the avoidance of triggers through techniques such as distraction, stimulus control, and changing the content of thoughts about smoking.…”
Section: Cbt Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interrater agreement was high and did not differ by arm (proportion of positive agreement = 0.91 for CBT; 0.99 for ACT; proportion of negative agreement = 0.00 for CBT; 0.00 for ACT). ACT calls were rated using the ACT Adherence Raters' Manual (modified from Gifford et al, 2004Gifford et al, , 2011, whereas CBT calls were rated using the Alere Call Quality Management Tool used in multiple NIH-funded trials (Bush et al, 2012;Hollis et al, 2007;Swan et al, 2003).…”
Section: Counselor Competence Ratingsmentioning
confidence: 99%