Effectiveness of capacity building interventions relevant to public health practice: a systematic review

Abstract

BackgroundThis systematic review assessed the effectiveness of capacity building interventions relevant to public health practice. The aim is to inform and improve capacity building interventions.MethodsFour strategies were used: 1) electronic database searching; 2) reference lists of included papers; 3) key informant consultation; and 4) grey literature searching. Inclusion (e.g., published in English) and exclusion criteria (e.g., non-English language papers published earlier than 2005) are outlined with included papers focusing on capacity building, learning plans, or professional development plans within public health and related settings, such as non-governmental organizations, government, or community-based organizations relating to public health or healthcare. Outcomes of interest included changes in knowledge, skill or confidence (self-efficacy), changes in practice (application or intent), and perceived support or supportive environments, with outcomes reported at the individual, organizational or systems level(s). Quality assessment of all included papers was completed.ResultsFourteen papers were included in this review. These papers reported on six intervention types: 1) internet-based instruction, 2) training and workshops, 3) technical assistance, 4) education using self-directed learning, 5) communities of practice, and 6) multi-strategy interventions. The available literature showed improvements in one or more capacity-building outcomes of interest, mainly in terms of individual-level outcomes. The available literature was moderate in quality and showed a range of methodological issues.ConclusionsThere is evidence to inform capacity building programming and how interventions can be selected to optimize impact. Organizations should carefully consider methods for analysis of capacity building interventions offered; specifically, through which mechanisms, to whom, and for which purpose. Capacity-building interventions can enhance knowledge, skill, self-efficacy (including confidence), changes in practice or policies, behaviour change, application, and system-level capacity. However in applying available evidence, organizations should consider the outcomes of highest priority, selecting intervention(s) effective for the outcome(s) of interest. Examples are given for selecting intervention(s) to match priorities and context, knowing effectiveness evidence is only one consideration in decision making. Future evaluations should: extend beyond the individual level, assess outcomes at organizational and systems levels, include objective measures of effect, assess baseline conditions, and evaluate features most critical to the success of interventions.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5591-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Feasibility and acceptability of community health extension workers to identify and treat hypertension associated with pregnancy: Implementation research report

“…The sample sizes in both study groups (40 and 14 women, respectively) were too small for firm conclusions, but these results show potential for this sort of PHC intervention. Where provider skills are enhanced, and essential commodities become more available, health outcomes will consequently improve, as seen in this study, and demonstrated in others [27][28][29] .…”

How can we support best practice? A situational assessment of injury prevention practice in public health

“…Given the mandate of PHO to provide scientific guidance to the field, support at a system level is the mechanism of most significant impact. A recent systematic review of the effectiveness of capacity building interventions in public health recommended efforts toward system level intervention given the variability of effectiveness of individual level capacity building [30]. In this case, pursuit of universal access to local data, increasing the usefulness of existing data sources and exploring data sharing agreements across sectors (such as transportation) can provide the necessary inputs to the development of local injury prevention programs.…”

Acceptability, Appropriateness, and Preliminary Effects of the PrEP Diffusion Training for Lay HIV Workers: Increased PrEP Knowledge, Decreased Stigma, and Diffusion of Innovation

“…The design of our evaluation is rigorous and has addressed several methodological issues identified in previous literature about evaluation of trainings and capacity building interventions [14,51]. First, we moved beyond traditional pre and post-test evaluation design and instead used a multi-time-point data collection approach.…”