2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation among older patients after acute myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, good exercise adherence could be considered a marker for adherence to other positive health behaviours which may also decrease the risk of mortality and clinical events. This has been previously observed by others, with increased attendance at on-site cardiac rehabilitation sessions related not only to reductions in all-cause mortality, re-admissions and major events, but also to greater improvements in clinical risk profile and secondary prevention behaviours such as medication and dietary adherence [128, 129]. Additionally, some ‘clustering’ of good lifestyle behaviours (diet, exercise, smoking cessation) was observed in survivors of MI, where increased adherence led to a decrease in mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke [130].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Consequently, good exercise adherence could be considered a marker for adherence to other positive health behaviours which may also decrease the risk of mortality and clinical events. This has been previously observed by others, with increased attendance at on-site cardiac rehabilitation sessions related not only to reductions in all-cause mortality, re-admissions and major events, but also to greater improvements in clinical risk profile and secondary prevention behaviours such as medication and dietary adherence [128, 129]. Additionally, some ‘clustering’ of good lifestyle behaviours (diet, exercise, smoking cessation) was observed in survivors of MI, where increased adherence led to a decrease in mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke [130].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Whereas in Eastern Europe and Central Europe, except Austria and Germany where outpatient CR is becoming more common, a short in-patient CR setting has emerged, most other European countries contrast with the tradition of the out-patient setting, which in general is offered over a longer period. The best scientific evidence of improvement in morbidity and mortality in the literature is found for programmes with more sessions and longer duration [16]. Therefore prompted by ECRIS and now by EuroCaReD, across Europe consensus should be found in future on programme content and duration, as well as on patient characteristics for each CR setting.…”
Section: Heterogeneity Of Cr Programme Delivery Across European Countmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant important covariates were included in the analysis. Age (years), gender (male/female) and number of comorbidities have both been shown to influence the outcomes following a variety of different interventions, including CR [17], [18] The duration of CR (length of core rehabilitation) was accounted for in analysis. The type of event/treatment prior to CR is likely to affect the patients' outcomes, to account for this variation patients were coded as medically managed or re-vascularised as shown in the NACR statistics report [6]. The IMD was calculated and ranked, from the most deprived to the least deprived regions, at for all 209 clinical commissioning groups and was included in this analysis [19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%