2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-57313/v2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation for recurrent headaches in children aged 7-14 years. A randomised clinical trial

Abstract: Background To investigate the effectiveness of chiropractic spinal manipulation versus sham manipulation in children aged 7-14 with recurrent headaches.Methods Design: A two-arm, single-blind, superiority randomised controlled trial.Setting: One chiropractic clinic and one paediatric specialty practice in Denmark Participants: 199 children aged 7 to 14 years, who experienced at least one episode of headache per week for the previous 6 months and with at least one musculoskeletal dysfunction identified. Interve… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the 18 studies included in the descriptive synthesis that explored the effectiveness of spinal manipulation in paediatric populations, one was focused on AIS [59], two on asthma [49,56], four on back/neck pain [57, 63, , 89], one on CP [74], two on headache [52,77], six on infantile colic -excessive crying / behaviours [53,58,68,71,85,92], one on infantile colic -sleeping disturbances [58] and one on torticollis [70]. Only 14 of the 62 included research articles provided supporting evidence (e.g., references to other papers) of psychometric properties for the outcome measures being utilised in the research evaluations and none of the articles provided actual psychometric values for reliability, validity and responsiveness, to suggest the selected outcome measure was a suitable tool to measure effectiveness of treatment.…”
Section: Effects Of Spinal Manipulation In Infants Children and Adole...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From the 18 studies included in the descriptive synthesis that explored the effectiveness of spinal manipulation in paediatric populations, one was focused on AIS [59], two on asthma [49,56], four on back/neck pain [57, 63, , 89], one on CP [74], two on headache [52,77], six on infantile colic -excessive crying / behaviours [53,58,68,71,85,92], one on infantile colic -sleeping disturbances [58] and one on torticollis [70]. Only 14 of the 62 included research articles provided supporting evidence (e.g., references to other papers) of psychometric properties for the outcome measures being utilised in the research evaluations and none of the articles provided actual psychometric values for reliability, validity and responsiveness, to suggest the selected outcome measure was a suitable tool to measure effectiveness of treatment.…”
Section: Effects Of Spinal Manipulation In Infants Children and Adole...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Headache A single systematic review exploring the effectiveness of spinal manipulation for improving impairments related to headache in children and adolescents [104], was included and indicated inconclusive results. Two included RCTs [52,77] have explored the effects of spinal manipulation across six different outcomes related to headache in children and adolescents. Whilst one large (n = 194) RCT [77] found spinal manipulation significantly reduced the number of days with headache and significantly enhanced the global perceived effect from parents, the collective included evidence exploring the effects of spinal manipulation demonstrated no significant changes to the duration of headache, days of school missed due to headache, consumption of analgesics or intensity of headache (see Supplementary File 5).…”
Section: Cerebral Palsy (Cp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation