“…Sixteen reviews stated that they had registered or otherwise published a review protocol 17 , 19 , 25 , 34 , 35 , 38 , 40 – 42 , 47 , 48 , 51 , 54 , 56 , 60 , 62 . After checking these protocols, thirteen were rated as incomplete as they missed information on the search terms defining the search strategy (item 2) 17 , 19 , 34 , 38 , 40 , 41 , 47 , 48 , 51 , 54 , 56 , 60 , 62 . All reviews searched at least two databases and provided their full search strategy in the final report, but 25 reviews 16 , 17 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 27 – 29 , 33 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 43 , 45 , 47 – 50 , 52 – 55 , 58 , 59 , 61 failed to justify publication restrictions, for example regarding language, entailing a “no” on item 4.…”