2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of cryogenic machining with modified tool holder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thesurface roughness value in cryogenic cooling method was found to be more as compared to other modes at all cutting speeds. These results were consistent with the results obtained by Ahmed et al [32] under cryogenic cooling condition. The increased workpiece hardness under cryogenic condition could be one of the possible reasons of increased surface roughness.…”
supporting
confidence: 94%
“…Thesurface roughness value in cryogenic cooling method was found to be more as compared to other modes at all cutting speeds. These results were consistent with the results obtained by Ahmed et al [32] under cryogenic cooling condition. The increased workpiece hardness under cryogenic condition could be one of the possible reasons of increased surface roughness.…”
supporting
confidence: 94%
“…Cryogenic cooling by liquid nitrogen jets provided reduction in average chip-tool interface temperature, high reduction in flank wear, better surface finish and dimensional accuracy as compared to dry machining of AISI 1060, AISI 1040, E4340C, AISI 4140 and AISI 4037 steels [10][11][12][13]. Cryogenic machining by liquid nitrogen with the help of modified tool holder provided longer tool life and more wear resistance compared to dry machining [14].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results indicated a substantial reduction in grinding forces with cryogenic cooling. Cryogenic machining using liquid nitrogen with the help of a modified tool holder provided longer tool life and more wear resistance, compared to dry machining (Ahmed et al 2007). Kalyan Kumar and Choudhury (2008) presented an experimental investigation of tool wear and cutting force in cryogenic machining.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%