Effectiveness of dexamethasone and low-power laser in minimizing oedema after third molar surgery: a clinical trial

Marković, A; Lj, Todorovic

doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2006.10.006

Cited by 157 publications

(112 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…4 It has been recommended to use local or systemic steroid and non-steroid anti-inflammatory therapy to reduce inflammation and relieve pain after molar surgery, but these drugs present some side effects, including gastrointestinal issues, systemic bleeding and allergic reactions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2,3 Moreover, post-operative inflammation disappears 5-7 days after surgery. 4 It has been recommended to use local or systemic steroid and non-steroid anti-inflammatory therapy to reduce inflammation and relieve pain after molar surgery, but these drugs present some side effects, including gastrointestinal issues, systemic bleeding and allergic reactions. 5 Several studies have demonstrated that laser therapy can accelerate cell and tissue reconstruction as well as relieve post-operative pain.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessment of Low-Level Laser Therapy Effects After Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar Surgery

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThird molar surgery is almost one of the most frequent procedures performed by maxillofacial surgeons. The surgical trauma leads to post-operation complications such as pain, inflammation and trismus.1 About 3-5 hours following surgery, the pain reaches its maximum intensity and may last 2-3 days; and then diminishes within 7 days after surgery.2,3 Moreover, post-operative inflammation disappears 5-7 days after surgery. 4 It has been recommended to use local or systemic steroid and non-steroid anti-inflammatory therapy to reduce inflammation and relieve pain after molar surgery, but these drugs present some side effects, including gastrointestinal issues, systemic bleeding and allergic reactions.5 Several studies have demonstrated that laser therapy can accelerate cell and tissue reconstruction as well as relieve post-operative pain. 5,6 Laser therapy is an open research field. However, some studies have shown useful findings in treatment of dentin hypersensitivity, temporomandibular joint disorders, inferior alveolar nerve paraesthesia resulting from third molar surgery, sagittal osteotomy, trigeminal neuralgia, labial herpes, aphthous ulcers and post-chemotherapy and ray inflammation. [7][8][9][10][11][12] As there are conflicting findings regarding the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and the importance of controlling third molar surgery's complications, this study aimed to assess the effect of LLLT on pain, swelling and maximum mouth opening in patients undergoing third molar surgery. In this study, we increased the number and variety of studied groups in order to reduce the error rate, in comparison to former researches. To eliminate the possible differences between several people in relevance to pain amount and also their reports on it, a bilateral surgery group was used to study the effects of LLLT on the post-operation pain and swelling. On the other hand, as maximum mouth The aim of this study was to assess the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on pain, swelling and maximum mouth opening in patients undergoing third molar surgery. Methods: A prospective, randomized double-blind study was undertaken on 44 patients at the Dental School, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, in 2015. A lowlevel laser was randomly applied on one of the two sides after surgery of 15 patients. The experimental side received 18 J/cm 2 of energy density, wavelength of 980 nm, and output power of 1.8 W. On the control side, a hand-piece was applied intra-orally, but laser was not activated. In addition, in order to evaluate trismus, 13 patients were treated by unilateral laser therapy and 16 patients did not receive laser therapy at all. The laser was administered intraorally on two points of vestibular and lingual sides at 1 cm from the surgery site, and extraorally at the emergence of the masseter muscle, immediately after surgery, and repeated 24 hours later. The pain, swelling and maximum mouth opening (MMO) were compared between the two groups at 24 hours and a week after surger...

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Low-Level Laser Therapy Effects After Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar Surgery

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several methods to control the immediate inflammatory response associated with head and neck surgery have been described and used, including the use of drugs such as analgesics [1][2][3], corticosteroids [3], antibiotics [4], and proteolytic enzymes [5], laser application [6], or physical therapeutic methods like cryotherapy [7] or manual lymph drainage (MLD) [8]. No single modality of management significantly prevents and/or significantly reduces the occurrence of swelling, pain and trismus without potential undesirable side effects.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Kinesiologic Tape on Post-operative Swelling After Orthognathic Surgery

Tozzi

Santagata

Sellitto

et al. 2015

J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Orthognathic surgery involves making several osteotomies that lead to varying degrees of post-operative swelling. The use of KT may be beneficial for postoperative treatment after head and neck surgery, accelerating drainage of tissue reaction or haemorrhages. The goal of this study was to find out if the application of KT prevents or improves swelling, pain and trismus after orthognathic surgery, improving patients' postoperative quality of life. Materials and Methods In this double-blinded, randomized, control trial, 24 patients in whom bimaxillary orthognathic surgery was indicated, were included. Before surgery each patient alternatively was randomly included in the study group (treated with K-Taping Ò and corticosteroid) or in the control group (treated with corticosteroid). In the present study a MakerBot Ò Digitizer 3D TM was used to assess accurate volume measurements. All swelling measurements were expressed as total 3-D area of the landmarks (cm 2 ) in T0 pre-operative, T1 fourth day after surgery. Results The differences T0-T1 are highly significant (p \ 0.01) between group 1 or study group (treated with K-taping Ò ) and group 2 (control group). Discussion The use of KT appears promising, because it is simple to carry out, less traumatic, economical, can be performed everywhere in the world, free from side effects on the body. Even when swelling persists, KT gives patients the impression of a minor swelling detracting them from their pain and morbidity. Further studies have to be performed to find out if KT can reduce or replace the need for additional medications such as the use of steroids.

show abstract

“…Antibiotics [9]. Other reported modalities include physical therapeutic methods such as cryotherapy [10] and laser application [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison Between Dexamethasone and Cool Jaw Wrap on Postoperative Pain After Surgical Removal of Lower Wisdom Teeth

Al-fahad

Shallawe

2017

Int J Curr Pharm Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective:The aim is to compare between the effect of cool jaw wraps and dexamethasone injection on postoperative pain and evaluate the quality of life after surgical removal of lower wisdom tooth.Methods: Extraction of impacted lower third molar will surgically operate (by the same difficulty of surgical extraction and same operator) on 30 patients, which divide into three groups, each group have 10 patients.We will instruct the patients in cool jaw wrap group to put cool jaw wrap after the operation. While the second group give dexamethasone injection after the operation. The last group which is the control group will left them with the usual instruction postoperatively.This study evaluates the facial pain, swelling, and trismus on days 1,2 and 7 postoperatively. Objective measurements of swelling, pain, and trismus were undertaken at days 1, 2 and 7. The quality of life questionnaire was estimated at day 7 postoperatively.Results: Cool jaw wrap showed no significant differences on the postoperative pain when it used after surgical removal of the lower third molar BUT have significant differences on the Quality of life of patients. Conclusion:Cool jaw face wrap can be recommended as a safe method that participates in some degree to reduce postoperative pain, it easy to handle, comfort, avoiding damage by freezing due to the barrier between cool jaw and skin and the patient can avoid the side effect of dexamethasone and the phobia from the injection.

show abstract

Effectiveness of dexamethasone and low-power laser in minimizing oedema after third molar surgery: a clinical trial

Cited by 157 publications

References 8 publications

Assessment of Low-Level Laser Therapy Effects After Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar Surgery

Assessment of Low-Level Laser Therapy Effects After Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar Surgery

Influence of Kinesiologic Tape on Post-operative Swelling After Orthognathic Surgery

Comparison Between Dexamethasone and Cool Jaw Wrap on Postoperative Pain After Surgical Removal of Lower Wisdom Teeth

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About