2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of different root-end filling materials in modern surgical endodontic treatment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An ideal apical sealing material should have bioactivity, biocompatibility, long-term sealing ability, good operating performance, and the ability to promote tissue healing [ 8 , 68 , 69 ]. In dentistry, almost all available restorative materials have been used as root-end filling materials, and bioceramics such as MTA are among the most prominent [ 70 ].…”
Section: Clinical Applications In Endodonticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ideal apical sealing material should have bioactivity, biocompatibility, long-term sealing ability, good operating performance, and the ability to promote tissue healing [ 8 , 68 , 69 ]. In dentistry, almost all available restorative materials have been used as root-end filling materials, and bioceramics such as MTA are among the most prominent [ 70 ].…”
Section: Clinical Applications In Endodonticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…126 The reported success rate of modern endodontic surgery with root-end filling with intermediate restorative material (IRM), super-ethoxybenzoic acid (Super-EBA) or MTA was 94%. 126 As a root-end filling material, MTA presents better treatment outcomes than amalgam, 126 resin composite 127 and gutta-percha, 128 while showing similar treatment outcomes to IRM and Super-EBA. 129 In vivo, animal studies have shown that MTA is associated with minimal inflammation around the surgical site, formation of new hard tissue over the material and repair of the periodontal ligament, which did not occur over IRM and Super-EBA.…”
Section: Vital Pulp Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported success rate of modern endodontic surgery with root‐end filling with intermediate restorative material (IRM), super‐ethoxybenzoic acid (Super‐EBA) or MTA was 94% 126 . As a root‐end filling material, MTA presents better treatment outcomes than amalgam, 126 resin composite 127 and gutta‐percha, 128 while showing similar treatment outcomes to IRM and Super‐EBA 129 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MTA typically consists of 75% Portland cement, 25% bismuth oxide, and 5% gypsum. It has been widely used in endodontic treatment for repairing lateral perforations, apexification, direct pulp capping, and root end filling [ 22 , 23 ]. During the clinical application of MTA, the hydration of Portland cement grants it sealing ability and mechanical strength, whereas bismuth oxide provides the required radiopacity to show the effects of endodontic treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%