2019
DOI: 10.1142/s0219649219500333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of Domain-Based Lexicons vis-à-vis General Lexicon for Aspect-Level Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract: One can either use machine learning techniques or lexicons to undertake sentiment analysis. Machine learning techniques include text classification algorithms like SVM, naive Bayes, decision tree or logistic regression, whereas lexicon-based sentiment analysis uses either general or domain-based lexicons. In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of domain lexicons vis-à-vis general lexicon, wherein we have performed aspect-level sentiment analysis on data from three different domains, viz. car, guitar a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are laborious, complicated, and time-consuming approaches that require a lot of effort [22,[27][28][29][30]. In the early days of ABSA, machine learning methods, such as semi-supervised [31,32], supervised [33,34], and unsupervised [35], lexicons-based approaches (i.e., domain-based lexicons and SentiWordNets) [36][37][38][39][40], rule-based or pattern-based techniques [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48], topic modelling based procedures [49][50][51], and tree or graph-based strategies [52,53] accomplished the feature and sentiment extraction task. Today, DL methods are famous for ABSA tasks, but including reasoning like the human brain remains an open research area.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are laborious, complicated, and time-consuming approaches that require a lot of effort [22,[27][28][29][30]. In the early days of ABSA, machine learning methods, such as semi-supervised [31,32], supervised [33,34], and unsupervised [35], lexicons-based approaches (i.e., domain-based lexicons and SentiWordNets) [36][37][38][39][40], rule-based or pattern-based techniques [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48], topic modelling based procedures [49][50][51], and tree or graph-based strategies [52,53] accomplished the feature and sentiment extraction task. Today, DL methods are famous for ABSA tasks, but including reasoning like the human brain remains an open research area.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this situation, ABSA fulfils this gap and handles these scenarios with enough ability which expresses the liked and disliked features of a targeted entity. It associates the sentiment polarity with specific aspects or features of any targeted entity [2], [21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are complicated, laborious, and time-consuming techniques which demand a lot of effort from analysts [12], [14], [23], [24], [25]. Moreover, the feature extraction task accomplishes through machine learning approaches such as supervised [26], [27], semi-supervised [28], [29], and unsupervised [30], lexicons-based methods, e.g., SentiWordNet and domain-based lexicons [2], [31], [32], [33], [34], rulebased or pattern-based approaches [7], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], topic modelling based techniques [42], [43], comprising MC-CNN that merges three vector representations to perform the task of ABSA. These incorporate GloVe, word2vec, and a one-hot character-based embedding.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, distance, syntactic dependency, and co-occurrence among them are always used to extract the opinion words of an aspect. When opinion words are extracted from the context at a certain distance from a specific aspect, we call it a distance-based technique (Nasim and Haider, 2017;Yadav and Roychoudhury, 2019). If opinion words modifying a specific aspect are extracted using the dependency parsing algorithm, we call it a dependency parsing technique (Quan and Ren, 2014;Afzaal et al, 2019b;Jiao and Qu, 2019;Wang et al, 2019a;2019c).…”
Section: Opinion Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%