2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mhp.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of early-intervention programs in German-speaking countries – a meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
23
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, some studies have revealed higher benefits for children from families with lower psychosocial resources, such as was found in the Nurse–Family Partnership program (Kitzman et al., ; Olds et al., ). For German‐speaking countries, which have their own specific cultural environments, early intervention structures, and policies (Benz & Sidor, ), the meta‐analysis of Taubner, Wolter, and Rabung () has revealed that especially the Ulm model showed significant effects on maternal sensitivity (Bovenschen et al., ; Pillhofer et al., ; Ziegenhain, Derksen, & Dreisörner, ). On the other hand, no effects on language development were found (Taubner et al., ).…”
Section: Early Interventions Promoting Maternal Sensitivity and Langumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, some studies have revealed higher benefits for children from families with lower psychosocial resources, such as was found in the Nurse–Family Partnership program (Kitzman et al., ; Olds et al., ). For German‐speaking countries, which have their own specific cultural environments, early intervention structures, and policies (Benz & Sidor, ), the meta‐analysis of Taubner, Wolter, and Rabung () has revealed that especially the Ulm model showed significant effects on maternal sensitivity (Bovenschen et al., ; Pillhofer et al., ; Ziegenhain, Derksen, & Dreisörner, ). On the other hand, no effects on language development were found (Taubner et al., ).…”
Section: Early Interventions Promoting Maternal Sensitivity and Langumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For German‐speaking countries, which have their own specific cultural environments, early intervention structures, and policies (Benz & Sidor, ), the meta‐analysis of Taubner, Wolter, and Rabung () has revealed that especially the Ulm model showed significant effects on maternal sensitivity (Bovenschen et al., ; Pillhofer et al., ; Ziegenhain, Derksen, & Dreisörner, ). On the other hand, no effects on language development were found (Taubner et al., ). Regarding the PAT program investigated in this article, a recent systematic review on its effectiveness with at‐risk families has found no evidence for significant positive effects on different measures of parent—child interaction (Neuhauser, ).…”
Section: Early Interventions Promoting Maternal Sensitivity and Langumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Germany, they mostly focus on the mother-infantrelationship [114], when a focus on postpartum depression and anxiety would be equally relevant. Recent meta-analyses show that programs starting during pregnancy were evaluated as the best when they had a high frequency of home visits [119,120]. There are findings of advantages of close and personal relating to one another, which comes close to a therapeutic setting.…”
Section: Pre-and Postnatal Interventions 41 Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Challenges for Behavioral Neuroscience: Prenatal, Postnatal, and Social Factors DOI: http://dx.doi.org /10.5772/intechopen.85368 Also, only small effects on child development have been observed, and these have been lower and more heterogeneous than the effects on mothers-to-be. Then again, having more than 20 sessions has proven helpful for the infant's physical development [119].…”
Section: Pre-and Postnatal Interventions 41 Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internationale Übersichtsstudien (Metaanalysen) früher Hilfen (vor der Geburt bis zum dritten Lebensjahr der Kinder einsetzend) wiesen Verbesserungen der elterlichen Erziehungskompetenzen und der kindlichen Entwicklung nach, insbesondere bei gezielten Maßnahmen für Risikogruppen. Bei den wenigen evaluierten deutschen frühen Präventions-programmen ist das bisher kaum der Fall (Taubner et al 2012). Deutschland ist hier noch Entwicklungsland.…”
unclassified