2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of GnRH antagonist in intrauterine insemination cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no case of OHSS in either group. Study by Cantineau et al [19,20] and Kamath et al [10] also did not show any significant difference with or without GnRH antagonist use. There were three cases in the control group and one case in the antagonist group of mild OHSS, and all were in cycles that resulted in pregnancy.…”
Section: Mild Ovarian Hyperstimulation (Moh) Is Defined As the Adminimentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There was no case of OHSS in either group. Study by Cantineau et al [19,20] and Kamath et al [10] also did not show any significant difference with or without GnRH antagonist use. There were three cases in the control group and one case in the antagonist group of mild OHSS, and all were in cycles that resulted in pregnancy.…”
Section: Mild Ovarian Hyperstimulation (Moh) Is Defined As the Adminimentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This could be due to the fact that these studies started using GnRH antagonist when the follicle reached 14 mm, whereas in our study it was started when the follicle reached 16 mm. Study by Kamath et al [10], Bakas et al [11] and Gomez-Palomares et al [12] used antagonist at follicle size of 16 mm. In our study no premature LH surge had occurred in either group when the follicle was C16 mm concluding that it is safe to administer GnRH antagonist with IUI on day till follicle reaches 16 mm.…”
Section: Mild Ovarian Hyperstimulation (Moh) Is Defined As the Adminimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although earlier investigations have shown the benefits of these molecules, (6,(15)(16)(17)(18) subsequent studies have failed to confirm them. (19)(20)(21)(22) In 2005, Gómez-Palomares et al concluded from their prospective randomised study that the addition of GnRH antagonists to COH + IUI cycles significantly increased pregnancy rates. (15) In 2008, another study by the same authors reported that the markedly better pregnancy rates seen in patients who were administered GnRH antagonists could be due to the multifollicular development of mature (> 18 mm) follicles, as GnRH antagonists allow for the growth of intermediate follicles without the risk of premature luteinisation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(21) In fact, a recent trial evaluating the effectiveness of GnRH antagonists in IUI cycles was discontinued because of the lower pregnancy rates observed in the GnRH antagonist group. (22) Similarly, the 2011 Cochrane review on ovarian stimulation protocols for IUI cycles did not reach a definite conclusion on the use of GnRH antagonists; while the use of GnRH antagonists was not advised in mild COH cycles, it was recommended that the utility of GnRH be determined in future trials. (10) In the present study, we were not able to prove the benefits of GnRH antagonists in clinical pregnancy rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%