2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of grade retention: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0
15

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
3
64
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, students on Pathway 4, early repetition, exhibited a lower academic self-concept at T 1 (in comparison with their non-repeating classmates), but that difference remained unchanged over the subsequent four years. These results are in line with previous studies indicating that repeating school years results in worse academic self-concept [ 61 , 62 , 72 ] and, hence, do not confirm research that indicated the opposite [ 18 , 58 , 63 , 66 ] or the big-fish-little-pond effect theory [ 68 ], which claimed that repeating students would improve their academic self-concept by comparing themselves to others with worse performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, students on Pathway 4, early repetition, exhibited a lower academic self-concept at T 1 (in comparison with their non-repeating classmates), but that difference remained unchanged over the subsequent four years. These results are in line with previous studies indicating that repeating school years results in worse academic self-concept [ 61 , 62 , 72 ] and, hence, do not confirm research that indicated the opposite [ 18 , 58 , 63 , 66 ] or the big-fish-little-pond effect theory [ 68 ], which claimed that repeating students would improve their academic self-concept by comparing themselves to others with worse performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In countries with higher repetition rates, teachers, families, and educational authorities share the idea that repeating a year is beneficial for a student’s educational process. Nonetheless, the effects of repetition are debatable [ 57 , 58 , 59 ], even more so when looking at the benefits of repetition on socio-emotional outcomes in general and academic self-concept in particular. Research has produced mixed and even contradictory results [ 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This practice has been mainly criticized as the expectation is that students who have been retained demonstrate academic progress, despite them being offered little or no support. As indicated in several meta‐analyses (Allen et al, 2009; Bright, 2011; Goos et al, 2021; Holmes, 1989; Jimerson, 2001) and systematic reviews (Jackson, 1975; Xia & Kirby, 2009) performed over the decades, grade retention does not produce the expected positive effects. Despite research findings, grade retention is still practiced in schools and viewed as a solution that has some merits.…”
Section: Statement Of Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is indeed a pervasive and shared conception that this measure can help underperforming students catch up with curriculum requirements (Van Canegem et al, 2021). However, as meta‐analyses and systematic reviews (Goos et al, 2021; Jimerson, 2001; Xia & Kirby, 2009) demonstrated, this measure has repeatedly failed to prove its beneficial effect on acquisitions. Accordingly, a school reform implemented by the Ministry of Education of Quebec (MEQ) invited school actors to abandon this controversial measure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%