2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2014.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of horticultural therapy: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
1
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
68
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there have been numerous studies on HT, a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on HT concluded that the studies conducted so far were relatively low quality [12]. In particular, descriptions of the study designs and statistical analyses had mostly been omitted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there have been numerous studies on HT, a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on HT concluded that the studies conducted so far were relatively low quality [12]. In particular, descriptions of the study designs and statistical analyses had mostly been omitted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Autistic Spectrum Disorders (Kern et al, 2011;O 'Haire, 2013) to severe mental illness (Barker & Dawson, 1998;Kamioka et al, 2014;Maujean et al, 2015;Wisdom et al, 2009), the literature increasingly indicates there is value in the facilitation of human-animal contact within interdisciplinary clinical practice. This therapeutic framework has resulted in the use of terms such as ''pet therapy'', ''animal-assisted therapy'' and ''animal-assisted activities'', referring to a reciprocal dynamic between humans and animals which addresses ''physical and/or emotional needs'' (Adams, 2010;Carmack, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis (Nimer & Lundahl, 2007) found only 29 of 250 studies were methodologically able to meet a minimal standard of rigor (Herzog, 2011). Studies are consistently limited by small sample sizes, inconsistent participant randomisation, selection bias and attrition rates (Kamioka et al, 2014;Morrison, 2012). Nonetheless, these limitations are combined with a broad spectrum of interventions, participant pools and environments to generate findings into the outcomes associated with animal-assisted therapies (Palley, O'Rouke, & Niemi, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar picture emerges for other green care interventions including, for example, therapeutic horticulture where there have been more attempts to conduct randomised trials with some tentatively promising results. 12 Within care farming, qualitative studies have shed light on the experiences of those attending care farms, highlighting the reasons why care farms can potentially improve mental health. 13 Care farmers themselves are often a key ingredient in the success of the care farm in supporting those with mental ill health.…”
Section: Debate and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%