Effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma with either mismatch repair proficient or metastatic microsatellite stable disease: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have limited efficacy in mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) or metastatic microsatellite stable (MSS) advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). ICIs, in conjunction with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) possessing anti-angiogenic properties, serve as a potential strategy for circumventing the resistance exhibited by MSS or pMMR mCRC to immunotherapeutic interventions. The present study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of ICIs + TKIs and provide a reference for the treatment of CRC. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were screened from January 1, 2003 to July 28, 2023. A total of 14 studies were included in qualitative and quantitative analyses, with a total of 819 patients enrolled. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale scores of the 14 cohort studies included were ≥7, indicating they were of a high quality. The objective response rate (ORR) of ICIs + TKIs was 14% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.08-0.24; P=0.132] in patients with advanced or metastatic MSS/pMMR CRC. The disease control rate (DCR) was 65% (95% CI, 0.58-0.74; P<0.0001). The overall incidence of adverse events of varying severity linked to combination of ICIs and TKIs in patients with advanced or metastatic MSS/pMMR CRC was 64% (95% CI, 0.52-0.78; P<0.0001). The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse reactions was 24% (95% CI, 0.14-0.4; P<0.0001). The sensitivity analysis indicated that the exclusion of individual studies did not yield statistically significant variations in combined analysis results. Based on the examination of publication bias, ORR and DCR, Begg's and Egger's tests had P-values of 0.114 and 0.395, respectively. Overall publication bias overall was absent in the Begg's funnel plot, as there was no apparent asymmetry. Nonetheless, the P-values of the Egger's and Begg's tests for adverse reactions and adverse reactions grade ≥3 were P= 0.008 and P= 0.048, respectively. The asymmetry of the Begg's funnel plots was evident, suggesting the presence of potential publication bias regarding adverse event results. In conclusion, the combination of ICIs and TKIs demonstrates a favorable effectiveness and notable safety profile in the management of patients with advanced or metastatic MSS/pMMR CRC.