2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10645-016-9277-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of In-Season Manager Changes in English Premier League Football

Abstract: We analyze the performance effects of in-season manager changes in English Premier League football during the seasons 2000/2001-2014/2015. We find that some managerial changes are successful, while others are counterproductive. On average, performance does not improve following a managerial replacement. The successfulness of managerial turnover depends on specific highly unpredictable circumstances, as we illustrate through case-studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
22
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The cumulative surprise measures how far teams perform below expectations and is calculated as the sum of the differences between the number of actual points and the expected points derived from betting odds. Using 36 dismissals and 33 matched counterfactual dismissals from the Dutch Eredivisie in the 14 seasons between 2000/01 and 2013/14, the authors also find that forced coach replacements do not improve team performance Besters, van Ours, and van Tuijl (2016). replicate the methods of van Ours and van Tuijl (2016) using 45 dismissals and 34 counterfactual dismissals from the English Premier League between improve following a coach's dismissal and that a successful managerial turnover remains highly unpredictable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cumulative surprise measures how far teams perform below expectations and is calculated as the sum of the differences between the number of actual points and the expected points derived from betting odds. Using 36 dismissals and 33 matched counterfactual dismissals from the Dutch Eredivisie in the 14 seasons between 2000/01 and 2013/14, the authors also find that forced coach replacements do not improve team performance Besters, van Ours, and van Tuijl (2016). replicate the methods of van Ours and van Tuijl (2016) using 45 dismissals and 34 counterfactual dismissals from the English Premier League between improve following a coach's dismissal and that a successful managerial turnover remains highly unpredictable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Following van Ours and van Tuijl (2016), we ignore coaching changes within the first four and last four match weeks. Further, followingBesters et al (2016), we only consider the first coach dismissal of a team within a season. For each coaching change, we documented at least one source that unambiguously states that the change was involuntarily.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of performance often focus on parts of the game such as manager changes and their impact (Gonzalez-Gomez, Picazo-Tadeo, & Garcia-Rubio, 2011) or the impact of ownership structure on team performance (Wilson, Plumley, & Ramchandani, 2013;Flint , Plumley, & Wilson, 2015;Besters, Van Ours, & Van Tuijl, 2016). While clubs can improve their performance with a mid-season manager change, they are not as efficient as clubs that do not change managers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of a soccer game can provide objective measures about the performance of each player and his or her team. Interactions inside a team can be considered as a cooperation based in a strategic plan, situational variables and restrictions in the general game context (Besters et al, 2016). Even controlling these metrics, soccer still has expected and unexpected facts that influence the result from a match (Aslan, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%