2016
DOI: 10.1080/14479338.2016.1233824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of innovation capability development methods

Abstract: Effectiveness of innovation capability development methodsThe literature presents numerous methods and practices for facilitating organizational innovation capabilities. Less attention has been paid to indicating the actual impact of these methods on different aspects of innovation capability. The current study focuses on this issue by examining three methods developed to facilitate organizational innovation capabilities and their effects on different aspects of innovation capabilities. The study uses the mult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it may also consider the socio-material contexts within hospitality settings that facilitate or drive innovative forms of deviance, either because they respond to flawed or incomplete organisational and consumer practices, or because the socio-material environment acts as an incubator, promoting innovative norm-breaking (cf. Baradarani & Kilic, 2017;Boukis, 2016;Ukko, Saunila, Parjanen, Rantala, Salminen, Pekkola, & Mäkimattila, 2016).…”
Section: Conclusion and Implications For Research And Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it may also consider the socio-material contexts within hospitality settings that facilitate or drive innovative forms of deviance, either because they respond to flawed or incomplete organisational and consumer practices, or because the socio-material environment acts as an incubator, promoting innovative norm-breaking (cf. Baradarani & Kilic, 2017;Boukis, 2016;Ukko, Saunila, Parjanen, Rantala, Salminen, Pekkola, & Mäkimattila, 2016).…”
Section: Conclusion and Implications For Research And Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firms innovative capability depends upon how firm absorbs, process, create, change and generate new technologies, routines and processes within the knowledge frontier (Çakar & Ertürk, 2010). Technological capabilities aid firms in maintaining innovation activities and testing the feasibility of new ideas and products (Ukko et al, 2016).…”
Section: Relationship Between Innovation Capability and Digital Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intra-organisational support affects EDI; how much resources are there to support idea generation and what are the relations of autonomy and control (Kesting and Ulhøi, 2010). Many tools that enhance EDI are basically very simple, such as an observation exercise, future-oriented discussion and interdisciplinary project groups (LO and The Danish Confederation of Trade Unions, 2007), but some of them may require external expertise, for example, in terms of a university collaboration (Eerola et al, 2015;Ukko et al, 2016). Universities and other formal education institutions have been stated to play a crucial role in enhancing innovation through different types of collaborations (Rantala and Ukko, 2018;M€ akimattila et al, 2015;Bishop et al, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The know-how built up through learning by doing, using and interactingwhile, for instance, co-creating service innovationsis much more difficult to measure (Ukko et al, 2016). According to Lundvall (2007), human capital measurements may register formal investment in education but what people learn at the workplace or as customers is not easy to EJIM 24,4 capture through standard measurements.…”
Section: Factors Of Innovativeness In Mode 2b Knowledge Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%