2019
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwy291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of Intensive Endoscopic Screening for Esophageal Cancer in China: A Community-Based Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is important to note that the baseline demographics did not differ between the intervention group and the control group. And the endoscopic compliance rate in our study was comparable or even higher compared with existed endoscopic screening of EC/GC [ 6 , 8 ]. We may further evaluate potential confounders in our future analysis to adjust potential select bias.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is important to note that the baseline demographics did not differ between the intervention group and the control group. And the endoscopic compliance rate in our study was comparable or even higher compared with existed endoscopic screening of EC/GC [ 6 , 8 ]. We may further evaluate potential confounders in our future analysis to adjust potential select bias.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Many studies showed that endoscopic screening might be associated with reduced mortality on EC and GC in some high-risk areas of Asia [ 4 8 ]. Considering the fact that striking geographic variations exist in the incidences of EC and GC within China, which can vary more than tenfold in different regions [ 9 ], whether endoscopic screening remains a cost-effective method with reduced mortality on EC and GC in areas with non-high risk were not well known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one study by Liu et al reported reductions in cumulative incidence and mortality from upper gastrointestinal cancer, in which the standardised incidence ratio was 0.57 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.86) and the standardised mortality ratio was 0.47 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.88). 9 However, the results were largely limited by few events (23 incident cases and 10 deaths) in the screened group, while the control group was estimated through calculations. 5 Evidence from observational studies shows inconsistent results in gastric cancer screening.…”
Section: Results In Relation To Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developed countries such as Japan and South Korea have launched nationwide endoscopic screening programmes, 6 7 while developing countries such as China and Iran conduct endoscopic screening only in high risk areas due to a larger cancer burden, capabilities of local doctors and availability of technology. [8][9][10][11] The current evidence from large population studies has confirmed that endoscopic screening is a cost-effective screening method for gastric cancer, 12 while the evidence for the effectiveness of oesophageal cancer screening are based predominately on smallsample sized, single-centre observational studies. 8 9 Furthermore, two ongoing randomised controlled trials are limited to intermediate outcomes due to insufficient follow-up time.…”
Section: What Are the New Findings?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] Many studies showed that endoscopic screening might be associated with reduced mortality on UGC in some areas of Asia with high incidence. [8][9][10][11][12] Therefore, China initiated a major public health program named Cancer Screening Program in Urban China (CanSPUC) in 2012 which was implemented in nationwide including high-incidence and non-high-incidence areas. 13 UGC screening in the CanSPUC was carried out through two-step screening method-a questionnaire combined with endoscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%