2014
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.7677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of Intraocular Pressure–Lowering Medication Determined by Washout

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a prospective analysis of 603 patients, Jampel and colleagues showed that the IOP changes caused by removing a medication was significantly less than the historically reported maximal IOP changes observed in monotherapy published trials, following discontinuation of a second or third medication class [ 14 ]. This finding highlights the complexity of understanding the true IOP effects of single-agent washout in clinical settings where patients are subject to multiple drug classes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In a prospective analysis of 603 patients, Jampel and colleagues showed that the IOP changes caused by removing a medication was significantly less than the historically reported maximal IOP changes observed in monotherapy published trials, following discontinuation of a second or third medication class [ 14 ]. This finding highlights the complexity of understanding the true IOP effects of single-agent washout in clinical settings where patients are subject to multiple drug classes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, the IOP did not return to baseline, as patients remained on at least one other IOP-lowering medication. This suggests that the effectiveness of PGAs is not as high as expected, especially in the setting of using multiple drug classes [ 14 , 19 ] (Stewart et al 2000). It is also possible that full responders, partial responders, and nonresponders to the PGA drug class were pooled in these studies, which the mean IOP values would not adequately reflect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations