2020
DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2020.1833348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of Low Vision Rehabilitation Using Microperimetric Acoustic Biofeedback Training in Patients with Central Scotoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“… 9 , 34 , 35 In AMD, the most common PRL location is the nasal quadrant, followed by the superior quadrant. 7 , 9 , 19 Similarly, in our study, we determined that the PRL was located in the nasal retinal quadrant in 31%, superior quadrant in 26%, inferior quadrant in 16%, and temporal quadrant in 11% of eyes, while 16% of PRLs were located centrally. We detected no statistically significant relationship between PRL location and fixation stability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 9 , 34 , 35 In AMD, the most common PRL location is the nasal quadrant, followed by the superior quadrant. 7 , 9 , 19 Similarly, in our study, we determined that the PRL was located in the nasal retinal quadrant in 31%, superior quadrant in 26%, inferior quadrant in 16%, and temporal quadrant in 11% of eyes, while 16% of PRLs were located centrally. We detected no statistically significant relationship between PRL location and fixation stability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Studies have shown that the PRL, which replaces the nonfunctioning fovea in eyes with central scotoma, is less stable as its distance from the fovea increases. 6 , 9 , 10 , 27 The mean PRL-fovea distance in AMD was reported to be 6.69°±7.4° by Erbezci and Oztürk 9 and 6.25°±2.38° by Sahli et al, 19 while Fujita et al 28 reported distances between 5° and 11°. In our study, the mean PRL-fovea distance was 5.15°±3.31° (range, 0.75°-14.2°).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Zheng [ 35 ] reported that patients have a higher demand for rehabilitation training of visual function, potentially related to the type of rehabilitation training and individual characteristics of patients. Clinical practice suggests that [ 36 39 ] rehabilitation training can improve the ability to utilize residual vision, and additional forms of rehabilitation training could be explored in the future to provide targeted rehabilitation training based on patients' needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants trained with a TRL showed a shift in PRL location toward the superior quadrant of the retina. Similarly, Morales et al (2020) and Sahli et al (2020) using microperimetry-informed biofeedback fixation training to teach patients to use a more convenient retinal location for fixation, reported improvement in fixation stability, reading acuity, reading speed and in self-reported visual functions (as assessed by the VFQ-25).…”
Section: Oculomotor Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%