“…Although such anti‐vaccine narratives are factually dubious, stories have proven to be influential communication tools that may trigger peripheral route processing, and often appear to be more persuasive than systematic, well‐reasoned arguments (Cunningham and Boom ). Narratives also seem to transcend education levels, catalyze salient emotional reactions, and garner empathy as people can personally identify with a storyline's characters, contexts, and communicated values (Cuesta, Martínez, and Cuesta ). At the same time, narrative framing , which involves positioning information within culturally sympathetic narratives, has been proposed as a means for reducing culturally cognitive reactance to scientific ideas (Kahan, Jenkins‐Smith, and Braman ).…”