2013
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of national evidence-based medicine competition in Taiwan

Abstract: BackgroundCompetition and education are intimately related and can be combined in many ways. The role of competition in medical education of evidence-based medicine (EBM) has not been investigated. In order to enhance the dissemination and implementation of EBM in Taiwan, EBM competitions have been established among healthcare professionals. This study was to evaluate the impact of competition in EBM learning.MethodsThe EBM competition used PICO (patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome) queries to exami… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings suggest that a competitive yet controlled simulation environment is a positive learning experience. This is consistent with previous studies, which highlight how the competitive nature of such events provides opportunities for participants to mature in the psychomotor and affective domains of adult learning [ 17 , 19 , 37 ]. Even the competition-induced stress plays as positive role, as stressful situations improve knowledge retention and, up to a certain level, performance [ 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings suggest that a competitive yet controlled simulation environment is a positive learning experience. This is consistent with previous studies, which highlight how the competitive nature of such events provides opportunities for participants to mature in the psychomotor and affective domains of adult learning [ 17 , 19 , 37 ]. Even the competition-induced stress plays as positive role, as stressful situations improve knowledge retention and, up to a certain level, performance [ 38 , 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Inherent reward and enjoyment can foster motivation. The effectiveness of competition in medical education has been well supported in the literature [ 17 – 19 ]. It has also been documented that competition can boost residents’ engagement in simulation training [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the origin of each study, only one study was conducted in Europe (Spain)10, and 19 in countries outside Europe including the USA,1123 Taiwan,24 Canada,25 Peru,26 Iran,27 Pakistan,28 and Israel 29. Twelve studies have been published since 2011 10,11,14,15,18,2026.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were found to improve their skills on locating evidence-based resources (3.0 vs 4.7, P <0.001), narrowing search findings (3.0 vs 4.6, P <0.001), and determining strategies to collect primary data (3.17 vs 4.63, P <0.001). Weng et al organized an EBM contest and used PICO (problem/population, intervention, comparison and outcome) tool to determine participants’ skills in formulating an answerable question, performing a literature search, critically appraising the evidence, and implementing into clinical practice teams 24. A significant increase was observed in the EBP knowledge and skills of the participants ( P <0.001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It integrates clinical epidemiology, biostatistics, research methods and informatics into health care. EBP implementation mainly involves four steps (Weng, Kuo, Yang, Liao, et al, 2013 ): first, framing a clear question based on a clinical problem; second, verifying relevant evidence from the literature; third, critically appraising the validity of contemporary research; and fourth, applying the findings to clinical decision-making. Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt ( 2014 ) use a 7-step EBP process, including: Step 0: Cultivate a spirit of inquiry along with an EBP culture; Step 2: Ask the PICO(T) question; Step 3: Critically appraise the evidence; Step 4: Integrate the evidence with clinical expertise and patient preferences to make the best clinical decision; Step 5: Evaluate the outcome(s) of the EBP practice change; Step 6: Disseminate the outcome(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%