2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.01.193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of Noninvasive Fibrosis Markers for the Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Hepatitis B and Chronic Hepatitis B+D Induced Cirrhosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean values of APRI and GAPRI at the end of treatment in both the naïve and experienced groups were below the cut-off values for significant fibrosis [9,10]. FIB-4, FORNS and the AP index obtained these values only in the naïve group [11,24,25]. It is noteworthy that the mean values of LSM (FibroScan) in each subgroup did not cross the border for insignificant fibrosis, which is 7.1 kPa [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean values of APRI and GAPRI at the end of treatment in both the naïve and experienced groups were below the cut-off values for significant fibrosis [9,10]. FIB-4, FORNS and the AP index obtained these values only in the naïve group [11,24,25]. It is noteworthy that the mean values of LSM (FibroScan) in each subgroup did not cross the border for insignificant fibrosis, which is 7.1 kPa [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At the start of treatment, when inflammation was the strongest, all the biomarkers strongly correlated with liver stiffness (FibroScan) and after 12 weeks of treatment this correlation decreased with the exception of the correlation with GAPRI, which increased. It is very satisfying that the value of tested non-invasive indirect markers of liver fibrosis after 12 weeks of treatment reached a value below the cut off for significant fibrosis, especially in the naïve group [9][10][11][12]24,25]. The mean values of APRI and GAPRI at the end of treatment in both the naïve and experienced groups were below the cut-off values for significant fibrosis [9,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the occult attacks and high recurrence rate of HCC, the overall survival (OS) rate of HCC patients is unsatisfactory 2 . Despite the progress that has been made in screening and forecasting the prognosis of HCC, there is still a lack of reliable and simple biomarkers that can detect and monitor the prognosis of patients with HCC 3 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cancers such as gastrointestinal tumors, ovarian cancer, melanoma, urinary system tumors, lung cancer, and glioblastoma, CHI3L1 can help to distinguish patients between a good prognosis and poor prognosis 7 . Studies have shown that deficiency of CHI3LI can ameliorate liver fibrosis and that upregulation of CHI3L1 can exaggerate HCC cells proliferation, invasion, and migration 2,3 . It is promising that CHI3L1 can help to screen and monitor the prognosis of patients with HCC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with chronic liver diseases are complicated with HCC, end-stage liver failure, and esophageal varices rupture [ 101 , 102 ]. While fibrosis indexes provide the prevalence of HCC in each fibrosis stage, tumor markers are superior to fibrosis indexes in the early detection of HCC [ 103 ]. For evaluating the loss of functional hepatic reserve, alternative noninvasive indexes including the Child–Pugh classification, albumin bilirubin grade, and MELD score are available [ 104 , 105 , 106 ].…”
Section: Revision Of the Idea “Liver Cirrhosis”mentioning
confidence: 99%