2011
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2011.640962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of normalized difference water index in modellingAedes aegyptihouse index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study improved previous epidemiology studies, which consider statistical models with linear relationships [47,36,37]. Such improvement is obtained by the use of Machine Learning tools that impose the user no significant additional effort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study improved previous epidemiology studies, which consider statistical models with linear relationships [47,36,37]. Such improvement is obtained by the use of Machine Learning tools that impose the user no significant additional effort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Finally this work presents several improvements regarding previous works [36,37,38,48], in terms of temporal data length, the use a more complete accessible operatively set of remotely sensed variables, and mostly with respect to the use of ML learning modeling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several studies, the importance of variables has been demonstrated, being the Land Surface Temperature (LST) and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) both of the most used variables in Ae. aegypti models developed [68].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the study by McCann et al (2010) where the risk was estimated using post codes with a mean surface area of 2,000 km 2 . Mapping potential habitats at a finer spatial scale could substantially improve the temporal and spatial resolution of current risk maps and create novel possibilities for improved disease management based on better understanding of transmission dynamics at the local habitat scale (Lacaux et al, 2007;Simoonga et al, 2009;Charlier et al, 2011;Estallo et al, 2012). Flexible, automated and operational tools capable of characterising vector habitats at high resolutions are, however, currently lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few initiatives have been undertaken to monitor SWBs using VHR satellite imagery (Dambach et al, 2009;Soti et al, 2009;Soti et al, 2010). Many studies use the freely available Landsat imagery (about 30-m resolution) and medium (20 m to 100 m) or coarse (>100 m) resolution imagery (Fuentes et al, 2001;Malone et al, 2001;Guo et al, 2005;Daniel et al, 2006;de Castro et al, 2006;Estallo et al, 2012). To study the typically small liver fluke vector habitats at the farm level, however, these relatively low resolutions are insufficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%