Effectiveness of Palonosetron, 1-Day Dexamethasone, and Aprepitant in Patients Undergoing Carboplatin-Based Chemotherapy

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Dexamethasone (DEX)-sparing strategy with 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist (5HT<sub>3</sub>RA) and aprepitant (APR), as triplet antiemetic prophylaxis, is associated with poor control of delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving carboplatin (CBDCA)-based chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate whether using palonosetron (PALO) as a 5HT<sub>3</sub>RA provides superior control with CINV than first-generation (1st) 5HT<sub>3</sub>RA in triplet antiemetic prophylaxis with a DEX-sparing strategy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Pooled patient-level data from a nationwide, multicenter, and prospective observational study were analyzed to compare the incidence of CINV between patients administered PALO and 1st 5HT<sub>3</sub>RA in combination with 1-day DEX and APR. <b><i>Results:</i></b> No significant differences were observed in the incidence of CINV, pattern of CINV, or severity of nausea by type of 5HT<sub>3</sub>RA in triplet antiemetic prophylaxis with DEX-sparing strategy. In both groups, the incidence of nausea gradually increased from day 3, peaked on day 4 or 5, and then declined slowly. The visual analog scale scores in the delayed phase remained high throughout the 7-day observation period. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Careful patient selection and symptom monitoring are needed when implementing the DEX-sparing strategy in triplet antiemetic prophylaxis for patients undergoing CBDCA-based chemotherapy. Furthermore, additional strategies may be needed to achieve better control of delayed CINV.