2015
DOI: 10.28945/2100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of Peer Assessment in a Professionalism Course Using an Online Workshop

Abstract: An online Moodle Workshop was evaluated for peer assessment effectiveness. A quasiexperiment was designed using a Seminar in Professionalism course taught in face-to-face mode to undergraduate students across two campuses. The first goal was to determine if Moodle Workshop awarded a fair peer grader grade. The second objective was to estimate if students were consistent and reliable in performing their peer assessments. Statistical techniques were used to answer the research hypotheses. Although Workshop Moodl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…give fair grades to their peers, consistent with what is expected, this evaluation is presented as reliable (Strang, 2015). Topping (2009) argues that this is an effective approach and encourages its use.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworksupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…give fair grades to their peers, consistent with what is expected, this evaluation is presented as reliable (Strang, 2015). Topping (2009) argues that this is an effective approach and encourages its use.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworksupporting
confidence: 66%
“…A study gives low or moderate quality feedback, and recommends it as "assessment for learning" rather than "assessment of learning" (Admiraal et al, 2014). Sometimes it is defended, more than as another type of assessment, as a change in the educational model (Vera-Cazorla, 2014): Summative and quantitative evaluation tool at the end of the process, and learning and qualitative assessment of students' understanding (Admiraal et al, 2014;Planas et al, 2013;Strang, 2015;Topping, 2009Topping, , 2017.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shum (2012) further expanded upon the learning analytics definition for a UNESCO policy briefing as being methods to analyze learning data and to improve learning systems through evidencedriven adaptation. He described three 'strategic' levels of analysis in learning analytics: macro (region/national/international) meso (institution-wide) individual user (student) (Shum, 2012, p. 3) In addition to above, the group, team, or course is often the strategic level of analysis (Strang, 2015a). The unit of analysis usually includes learning performance (e.g., grade or academic performance) as the dependant variable but other fields are sometimes analyzed such as satisfaction, specific outcome artifacts or career advancement.…”
Section: Learning Analytics Factors and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the assessment problem, the second author uses Moodle in conducting peer assessments, and according to Strang, this is also very effective (David Strang, 2015). He also predicts student learning outcomes based on logs of online learning activities recorded in Moodle (Strang, 2017).…”
Section: Co-authorship Analysis (Author)mentioning
confidence: 99%