2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0149-1970(01)00012-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of pentran™'s unique numerics for simulation of the Kobayashi benchmarks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this report, we only discuss the results obtained for D gj I the pure absorber cases. Sjoden, 1999c, andHaghighat et al, 2001 provide detailed discussions on both pure absorber and 50% scattering problems, and demonstrate the impact of the TPMC and ADS formulations on the solution accuracy. The reminder of this Chapter is allocated to discussions on the three Kobayashi benchmark problems and the comparison of PENTRAN solutions to the reference solutions provided in Kobayashi et al, 1999.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this report, we only discuss the results obtained for D gj I the pure absorber cases. Sjoden, 1999c, andHaghighat et al, 2001 provide detailed discussions on both pure absorber and 50% scattering problems, and demonstrate the impact of the TPMC and ADS formulations on the solution accuracy. The reminder of this Chapter is allocated to discussions on the three Kobayashi benchmark problems and the comparison of PENTRAN solutions to the reference solutions provided in Kobayashi et al, 1999.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the deterministic transport equation, parallel and vector formulations, adaptive differencing formulations, acceleration techniques, automated techniques for multigroup cross-section generation, and pre-and post-processing software have been developed and used for various benchmarking and real-world problems encountered in nuclear power, nuclear nonproliferation and safeguards, and radiation therapy and diagnostics. These activities have resulted in the development of the PENTRAN code system [6], PENMSH and PENMSHXP [7], TITAN hybrid code system [5], Adaptive differencing Strategy (ADS) [8], spatial and angular multigrid and synthetic acceleration schemes [9]. In Monte Carlo particle transport, their efforts have resulted in the development of the automated variance reduction technique, i.e., CADIS (Consistent Adjoint Driven Importance Sampling) [10], and its implementation in the MCNP code system, i.e., A 3 MCNP code [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%