A lthough rare today, a shocking 1374 deaths due to pertussis occurred in Canada in 1923. 1 Vaccination played a pivotal role in decreasing cases of pertussis. The adverse-event profile of the whole-cell vaccine prompted a switch to the acellular vaccine in the late 1990s. Although still cyclical, the incidence of pertussis in children declined overall within a few years. 2 In the early 2000s, an increase in cases among teenagers prompted the recommendation for a booster dose in adolescents and, subsequently, in adults. However, the findings of a linked research paper show that there has been an increase in both outbreaks and sporadic disease, despite good vaccine coverage in Canada and globally. 3,4 In their study, Schwartz and colleagues 4 used linked databases from the public health laboratory and population-based health administrative data in Ontario to determine vaccine effectiveness over time. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71%-86%) at 15-364 days, 84% (95% CI 77%-89%) at one to three years, 62% (95% CI 42%-75%) at four to seven years and 41% (95% CI 0%-66%) at eight or more years since last vaccination. 4 Their results yielded good news (the acellular vaccine works) and bad (the effectiveness does not last forever).The group then exploited the presence of the two cohorts (pertussis positive and pertussis negative) to create a case-control study and compared those who had been "primed" or not with whole-cell vaccine. People who received only the acellular vaccine had a 2.2 times higher odds of pertussis than those primed with three doses of whole-cell pertussis vaccine, and a 1.82 times higher odds than those who had at least one priming dose of a whole-cell vaccine. This suggests that even one prior dose of whole-cell vaccine conferred added protection.After seeing success in decreasing disease, why are we witnessing a resurgence of pertussis that has apparently accelerated in a cohort that received only the acellular vaccine? This phenomenon is not completely understood, but these epidemiologic studies are critical in understanding the biology of prevention. Other factors, such as increased reporting and the discovery of pertactinnegative pertussis strains (or other genetic variants), could also be operating, but they appear to be of less importance currently.At the heart of the issue is the current pertussis vaccine. Both the acellular and whole-cell vaccines in human and animal models induce high, protective antibody titers to pertussis toxins and therefore confer protection against disease, at least in the short term.5 However, the antibody decay may be faster with the acellular vaccine than was seen with the whole-cell vaccine. Using epidemiologic modelling of disease incidence in the United States, investigators were able to show that even a small decrease in efficacy and duration of protection with the acellular vaccine compared with the whole-cell vaccine could account for the increased incidence of pertussis and the curious shifts in high incidence from...