2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08352-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of positron emission tomography in the preoperative assessment of patients with suspected non-small-cell lung cancer: the PLUS multicentre randomised trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

10
367
0
29

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 788 publications
(406 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
10
367
0
29
Order By: Relevance
“…The likelihood of inadvertently treating benign disease can be reduced by applying the criteria described by Swenson et al (age, smoking history, previous cancer, greatest tumor dimension, spiculation, and tumor location 7 ) combined with the results of FDG-PET 6 to estimate the probability of malignancy. Although the use of FDG-PET reduces the likelihood of benign disease to <5%, 32 we continue to recommend a cytologic or histologic diagnosis when possible, particularly because a preoperative transthoracic biopsy has not been associated with an increased risk of death. 33 In our patients, identical outcomes were observed between patients with and without histologic proof of malignancy (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The likelihood of inadvertently treating benign disease can be reduced by applying the criteria described by Swenson et al (age, smoking history, previous cancer, greatest tumor dimension, spiculation, and tumor location 7 ) combined with the results of FDG-PET 6 to estimate the probability of malignancy. Although the use of FDG-PET reduces the likelihood of benign disease to <5%, 32 we continue to recommend a cytologic or histologic diagnosis when possible, particularly because a preoperative transthoracic biopsy has not been associated with an increased risk of death. 33 In our patients, identical outcomes were observed between patients with and without histologic proof of malignancy (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that combined 18 F-FDG PET/CT has a greater diagnostic accuracy when compared with CT alone, PET alone or the conventional visual correlation of PET and CT in assessing primary tumor, lymph node (LN), and metastasis of non-small-cell lung cancer. It also leads to a change of treatment more frequently when compared with PET alone or CT alone [8,9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…contrast agent on the interpretation of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in both technical and clinical aspects. For this purpose, in patients with lung cancer, we fi rst measured the changes in standardized uptake value (SUV) caused by the i.v.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, PET/CT did not impact survival which, after clinical follow-up for 1 year, was similar in both groups. Similar to previous trials reporting on the diagnostic accuracy of dedicated PET (without coregistration of CT) [8], about five PET/CT scans have to be performed to avoid one futile thoracotomy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Prevention of unnecessary surgical interventions has been reported to occur in up to 14% of patients [9]. Recently, a randomized study has shown that the number of futile thoracotomies was significantly reduced in 19/82 patients compared to 29/96 patients, based on the addition of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET to the diagnostic algorithm [8]. The present study by Søgaard et al showed similar results with 21/98 futile thoracotomies in the PET/CT group compared to 38/91 surgical interventions in the control group which were interpreted as futile.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%