“…Proponents of credentialing argue that it protects the public from unethical or incompetent practitioners (Arbuckle, 1977), that credentialing serves the long-range interests of consumers (Sweeney, 1978), that it provides eligibility for third-party reimbursement (Carroll, Griggs, & Halligan, 1977), and that credentialing protects counselors from cease and desist orders issued by state psychology boards (Cottingham & Warner, 1978). Proponents point to research showing the effectiveness of experienced counselors for positive client outcomes (Berman & Norton, 1985;Mallinckrodt & Nelson, 1991;Nietzel & Fisher, 1981).…”