2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of quadrivalent influenza vaccination in the first year of a funded childhood program in Queensland, Australia, 2018

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to our report, the VE among children aged 1–2 years was higher (63%) than the VE among children aged 2–5 years (45%–57%) in a prospective, non-randomized, observational study [21] . In contrast, according to a recent report in Australia, the adjusted VE analyzed by a matched case-control study increased with age among children 6 months to 4 years [22] . However, it is difficult to compare the VE with the previously published data because we could not exclude the effect of infection history or previous immunization, maternal immunization during pregnancy, dose-effect (once or twice), and difference in analyzed season and methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to our report, the VE among children aged 1–2 years was higher (63%) than the VE among children aged 2–5 years (45%–57%) in a prospective, non-randomized, observational study [21] . In contrast, according to a recent report in Australia, the adjusted VE analyzed by a matched case-control study increased with age among children 6 months to 4 years [22] . However, it is difficult to compare the VE with the previously published data because we could not exclude the effect of infection history or previous immunization, maternal immunization during pregnancy, dose-effect (once or twice), and difference in analyzed season and methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…We suppose that some children do not receive the vaccine twice because the cost (approximately $30–40 per dose) is not covered by national health insurance or the national government, because parents/guardians do not have time to take their children to the clinic, or because parents/guardians forget to arrange the second vaccination. Vaccine dose (once or twice) may influence the VE among young children [22] , [25] , [26] . However, no significant difference was observed in the present overall age-adjusted analysis when once or twice vaccine doses were compared ( Table 2 , Table 3 , Table 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…33 Australia started a single-dose vaccination program in 2005, and Canadian provinces did the same between 2000 and 2007. 34, 35 In the VIPS II cohort, the majority of parents reported prior vaccination (prior chicken pox in only three), and baseline IgG serologies supported prior VZV exposure in 97% of cases. The time interval from vaccination (initial VZV exposure) to stroke was generally prolonged—a median of six years—much longer than the historic time interval (weeks to months) between chicken pox and stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%