2017
DOI: 10.1111/pbr.12517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of quantitative resistance conferred by the genetic background of pepper in the control of root‐knot nematodes and influence onto durability of Me1‐ and Me3‐resistant genes in greenhouse conditions

Abstract: In pepper (Capsicum annuum), the major genes (R‐genes) Me1 and Me3 confer resistance against root‐knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.). The combination of R‐genes and quantitative resistance factors in the same genotype is considered a good breeding strategy for increasing the durability of R‐genes. To ascertain this hypothesis, five pepper inbred lines, differing in their quantitative resistance level, were combined with Me1 or Me3 genes in F1 hybrids. The resistance of inbred lines and F1 hybrids was evaluated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, when a major gene was combined with a quantitative resistance with a 50% efficiency, the breakdown of the major gene was nearly as quick as if the major gene was alone, regardless of the pathogen life-history trait targeted by the quantitative resistance ( Fig 5A , column 3 to 6, and inset). This conclusion is consistent with the results of an experimental study on pepper resistance against root-knot nematode [ 121 ], but differs from those of other studies carried out on different pathosystems, showing that a quantitative resistant background can significantly increase the durability of a cultivar carrying a major gene for resistance [ 122 124 ]. In order to test if this difference could be due to our assumption that quantitative resistance has a 50% efficiency, we replicated the numerical experiment with higher efficiencies (ρ w = 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In contrast, when a major gene was combined with a quantitative resistance with a 50% efficiency, the breakdown of the major gene was nearly as quick as if the major gene was alone, regardless of the pathogen life-history trait targeted by the quantitative resistance ( Fig 5A , column 3 to 6, and inset). This conclusion is consistent with the results of an experimental study on pepper resistance against root-knot nematode [ 121 ], but differs from those of other studies carried out on different pathosystems, showing that a quantitative resistant background can significantly increase the durability of a cultivar carrying a major gene for resistance [ 122 124 ]. In order to test if this difference could be due to our assumption that quantitative resistance has a 50% efficiency, we replicated the numerical experiment with higher efficiencies (ρ w = 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In contrast, when a major gene was combined with a quantitative resistance with a 50% efficiency, the breakdown of the major gene was nearly as quick as if the major gene was alone, regardless of the pathogen life-history trait targeted by the quantitative resistance ( Fig 5A, column 3 to 6, and inset). This conclusion is consistent with the results of an experimental study on pepper resistance against root-knot nematode [121], but differs from those of other studies carried out on different pathosystems, showing that a quantitative resistant background can significantly increase the durability of a cultivar carrying a major gene for resistance [122][123][124]. In order to test if this difference could be due to our assumption that quantitative resistance has a 50% efficiency, we replicated the numerical experiment with higher efficiencies (ρw=60%, 70%, 80%, 90%).…”
Section: What Is the Durability Of A Major Gene Alone Or Combined Witsupporting
confidence: 92%