2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12613-011-0471-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of sodium silicate as gangue depressants in iron ore slimes flotation

Abstract: The recovery of iron from the screw classifier overflow slimes by direct flotation was studied. The relative effectiveness of sodium silicates with different silica-to-soda mole ratios as depressants for silica and silicate bearing minerals was investigated. Silica-to-soda mole ratio and silicate dosage were found to have significant effect on the separation efficiency. The results show that an increase of Fe content in the concentrate is observed with concomitant reduction in SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 levels when a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it is known to adsorb with a high affinity on the gangue mineral surfaces, mostly silicates, and therefore, it constitutes a strong depressant in the froth flotation process. Over the past decades, Na 2 SiO 3 has been successfully used in the flotation separation of rare earth minerals (Filippov et al, 2016), zinc minerals (Ejtemaei et al, 2012), iron minerals (Rao et al, 2011), scheelite (CaWO 4 ) (Kupka and Rudolph, 2018a;Yang, 2018;Foucaud et al, 2019c), fluorite (Song et al, 2006;Zhou et al, 2013), apatite (Qi et al, 1993;Sis and Chander, 2003), and many other minerals. The behavior of Na 2 SiO 3 in aqueous solutions have been intensively investigated: depending on the pH of the solution and the total silica concentration, the silica tetrahedral (SiO 4 ) can be under SiO 4− 4 , SiO 3 (OH) 3− , SiO 2 (OH) 2− 2 , SiO(OH) − 3 , and Si(OH) 4 forms (Engelhardt et al, 1975;Marinakis, 1980;Marinakis and Shergold, 1985;Bass and Turner, 1997;Halasz et al, 2007;Jansson et al, 2015).…”
Section: Sodium Silicatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is known to adsorb with a high affinity on the gangue mineral surfaces, mostly silicates, and therefore, it constitutes a strong depressant in the froth flotation process. Over the past decades, Na 2 SiO 3 has been successfully used in the flotation separation of rare earth minerals (Filippov et al, 2016), zinc minerals (Ejtemaei et al, 2012), iron minerals (Rao et al, 2011), scheelite (CaWO 4 ) (Kupka and Rudolph, 2018a;Yang, 2018;Foucaud et al, 2019c), fluorite (Song et al, 2006;Zhou et al, 2013), apatite (Qi et al, 1993;Sis and Chander, 2003), and many other minerals. The behavior of Na 2 SiO 3 in aqueous solutions have been intensively investigated: depending on the pH of the solution and the total silica concentration, the silica tetrahedral (SiO 4 ) can be under SiO 4− 4 , SiO 3 (OH) 3− , SiO 2 (OH) 2− 2 , SiO(OH) − 3 , and Si(OH) 4 forms (Engelhardt et al, 1975;Marinakis, 1980;Marinakis and Shergold, 1985;Bass and Turner, 1997;Halasz et al, 2007;Jansson et al, 2015).…”
Section: Sodium Silicatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…depressed. Therefore, Na 2 SiO 3 is commonly used in the otation separation of rare earth minerals, 11 zinc minerals, 12 iron minerals, 13 scheelite (CaWO 4 ), [14][15][16][17] uorite (CaF 2 ), 18,19 apatite [Ca 5 (PO 4 ) 3 (OH,F)], 20,21 and many other minerals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inhibition effect of the depressant on upgrading is a common issue in flotation. As is well known, floatability of the minerals greatly depends on the surface properties of the minerals, such as the crystal anisotropy, which can be greatly influenced by the depressant [24][25][26][27]. Take scheelite as an example; the wettability of the (001) plane of scheelite decreased slightly, whilst increasing the dosage of Al-SiO3, while the wettability of the (112) plane decreased significantly.…”
Section: Flotation Tests In Labmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XRD results show that quartz, chlorite, muscovite, feldspar, and amphibole also exist in the rougher concentrate, which could be due to the entrainment of super fine particles in the foam. The existence of those minerals made it easier for the grinding process to get muddy because of their lower hardness [27][28][29], posing great challenges for the separation of them from the valuable minerals by flotation. As shown in Figure 6, D 50 of the rougher concentrate was 0.021 mm, which falls into the fine particle size range, causing problems for further improvement of the concentrate quality.…”
Section: Flotation Tests In Labmentioning
confidence: 99%