2016
DOI: 10.14738/assrj.33.1894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of the mechanisms of fraud prevention and detection in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings revealed that organizational use of forensic accountants was the least often used of any anti-fraud method but had the highest effectiveness rating. A similar finding was obtained by Efiong, Inyang & Joshua [20]. There is therefore the need to discover why an essential service such as this could have a low usage.…”
Section: Background Of the Studysupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The findings revealed that organizational use of forensic accountants was the least often used of any anti-fraud method but had the highest effectiveness rating. A similar finding was obtained by Efiong, Inyang & Joshua [20]. There is therefore the need to discover why an essential service such as this could have a low usage.…”
Section: Background Of the Studysupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Isa (2011) for example, claimed that "the literature on fraud consistently claimed that an effective internal control system (ICS) is the primary means of preventing, detecting, and correcting fraud and errors". In contrast, Efiong, Inyang and Joshua (2016) posited that "forensic accounting techniques appeared to be the most effective and are currently used in most developed countries of the world". Many other studies stated that seem inconsistent with others in the subject of the effectiveness of fraud prevention mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussion: the Potential Outcome Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a lot of perception studies (ACFE, 2018;Othman et al, 2015;Bierstaker et al, 2006;Otieno, 2018;Mangala & Kumari, 2017;Zamzami, Nusa & Timur, 2016;Omar & Abu Bakar, 2012;Efiong, Inyang & Joshua, 2016;Micheni, 2016;Rahman & Anwar, 2014) conducted to establish the perceived effectiveness of preventive controls. The aforementioned studies observed that preventive controls comprising of enhanced audit commitees, internal audit department , staff rotation, fraud reporting policy, proper due diligence on customers, reference check on employees, code of conduct are very effective in deterring fraud.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With reference to studies (Othman et al, 2015;Bierstaker et al, 2006;Otieno, 2018;Mangala & Kumari, 2017;Hakami & Rahmat, 2019;Zamzami, Nusa & Timur, 2016;Omar & Abu Bakar, 2012;Efiong, Inyang & Joshua, 2016;Micheni, 2016;Rahman & Anwar, 2014) conducted to establish the perceived effectiveness of detective controls. It was established that operational audits, fraud hotlines, forensic accountants, continous auditing, reference check on employees, data mining, fraud hotlines, virus protection, firewalls and filtering software were perceived to be effective in detecting and deterring fraud in Haron et al, (2014) contended that forensic accountants have the advantage of investigating beyond the accounting figures over the traditional auditors or the accountants.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%