1995
DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199501000-00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of the Self-Inflating Bulb for Verification of Proper Placement of the Esophageal Tracheal Combitube Registered Trademark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6). The device is also inserted blindly, and the upper and lower elastic balloons inflated 11 . The esophagus and oropharynx are completely obliterated, allowing the ventilation perforations between the two obturator balloons to ventilate the trachea.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). The device is also inserted blindly, and the upper and lower elastic balloons inflated 11 . The esophagus and oropharynx are completely obliterated, allowing the ventilation perforations between the two obturator balloons to ventilate the trachea.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the 2nd generation SADs have many desirable features, they are, nevertheless, inserted in the same 'blind fashion' as the 1st generation devices, based on educated guesses about correct placement, appropriate device size and insertion depth. Clinicians still rely on a range of subjective indirect assessment and clinical tests (Table 1), dedicated to the simple task of correct placement of a single device [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. This plethora of tests should alert clinicians that 'all is not well inside the camp'.…”
Section: Why the Need For Sad Placement Under Direct Vision?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the Combitube is a double lumen tube and can enter either the trachea or oesophagus, it is imperative that ventilation occurs through the correct lumen. As with the tracheal tube, the gold standard is identification of CO 2 in expired gas, but the oesophageal detector device described by Wee has recently been shown to be effective (Wafai et al, 1995).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Combitubementioning
confidence: 99%