Effectiveness of Treatments of Depression in Older Ambulatory Patients

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of acutephase pharmacological and psychological treatments of depression in older ambulatory patients by systematically reviewing original research relevant to this topic.Methods: Searches in MEDLINE and PsycINFO and manual reviews of bibliographies located 233 articles. Of these, 40 (37 different studies) met our 8 inclusion criteria: original research, written in English or French, subjects 55 years and older, diagnosis of depression, outpatient or community setting, prospective controlled study design, acute-phase pharmacological or psychological treatment, and outcome measure of depression. Two independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality of each article using a standard form and a quality score was computed. Quantitative data on levels of depression at the end of treatment were abstracted. Results were grouped by specific treatment comparison (type of treatment and type of control group). For comparisons that used the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, we computed mean posttreatment differences. Effect sizes were computed from the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale or an alternative scale.Results: In studies that compared active drugs with placebo, the heterocyclic drugs significantly reduced the posttreatment Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (mean difference, −5.78; 95% confidence interval, −8.31 to −3.25); other drugs had smaller effects. In studies that compared active drugs, there were no significant differences overall between different classes of drugs; selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors appeared to be as effective as heterocyclic drugs. Rational psychological treatments performed significantly better than no treatment (mean posttreatment Hamilton Depression Rating Scale difference, −7.25; 95% confidence interval, −10.10 to −4.40) but not significantly better than that for controls who received similar attention. Adjustment for the study quality score did not affect these results.Conclusions: Based on comparisons with untreated controls, heterocyclic antidepressants and rational psychological therapies appear to be the most effective treatments for older ambulatory patients with mild to moderate depression. Based on drug-drug comparisons, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors appear to be as effective as heterocyclic drugs. However, overall, the magnitude of the treatment effects is modest. Limitations in the quantity and quality of appropriate studies suggest a sober approach to treatment in this population. Med. 1998;158:705-712 F IVE PUBLISHED meta-analyses of treatments of depression in the elderly (3 on antidepressants, 1-3 1 on psychosocial therapies, 4 and 1 on both 5 ) and a consensus conference 6 have concluded that pharmacological and psychosocial treatments are effective. However, these reviews included many studies of psychiatric inpatients who usually have more severe depression than that seen in ambulatory settings and did not compare pharmacological and psychological approaches. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysi...

Systematic detection and multidisciplinary care of depression in older medical inpatients: a randomized trial

“…In a study involving elderly ambulatory patients, we had found a mean difference in HAMD scores between the intervention and usual-care groups of 5-7 points. 33 Among physically ill and disabled elderly medical inpatients, we anticipated that the difference would be less (i.e., 4 points). On the basis of an estimated standard deviation of change in the HAMD score of 8.0, 34 we determined that 85 subjects would be required in each group to detect a change of at least 4 points in the HAMD score.…”

A Minimal Psychological Intervention in Chronically Ill Elderly Patients with Depression: A Randomized Trial

“…Psychological treatments and self-management approaches seem to be good alternatives in this population, in which polypharmacy-related problems are often an issue as well. Several meta-analyses have shown that psychological treatments, including cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), are effective in the treatment of depression in older adults [11,12,13]. Two studies on collaborative care have further suggested that somatic comorbidity does not adversely affect the positive response [14,15], and studies on psychological interventions (including CBT) or self-management in chronically ill elderly patients found beneficial effects on various outcomes [16,17,18,19,20,21].…”

Psychological treatment of late‐life depression: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

“…In a systematic review of meta-analyses of psychological treatments for depression in all age groups (Cuijpers and Dekker, 2005), we identified six meta-analyses of psychological treatments for depression in late life (Scogin and McElreath, 1994;Koder et al, 1996;Engels and Vermey, 1997;Cuijpers, 1998;McCusker et al, 1998;Gerson et al, 1999). None of these meta-analyses, however, has focused on randomized controlled trials only, and all also included studies in which the respondents were not allocated randomly to conditions, while this is known to be the most crucial element of being sure that a treatment effect can actually be attributed to the treatment (Higgins and Green, 2005).…”