Citation for published version (APA):Lim, F. J., Wake, Z. V., Levy, A., Tempone, S., Moore, H. C., Richmond, P. C., ... Blyth, C. C. (2016). Viral etiology and the impact of co-detection in young children presenting with influenza-like illness. Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Disease Society, 6(3), 260-266. [piw042]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piw042General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in Discovery Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from Discovery Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research.• You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain.• You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
ResponseAs the reviewer has suggested, the differences in the presented results in the Abstract were due to rounding. To minimise confusion, we have amended the abstract to report results up to 1 decimal place as appropriate (pp.5-6).The calculation of the predicted probabilities from the logistic regression model needs to be clearly described in the methods section. Whether the predicted probability for flu + RSV is significantly higher than others need to be clarified as well.
ResponseWe have clarified this in the abstract of the revised manuscript (pp.5-6).
Introduction Suggest reconcile description of study settings with information from methods, as apparently not all recruitments were done at the emergency department ResponseTo simplify analyses and minimise confusion regarding the study setting, we have chosen to exclude children enrolled from general practises in the revised manuscript. Only 131 were recruited from general practice in 2008-2009 before this arm of the study was stopped. All children included in the analyses were enrolled while they were transiting through the emergency department. A portion of these children would subsequently have been admitted as inpatients. We have included additional information on the timing and location of enrolment in the Introduction (p.7) with further information included in the Methods section (p.8). The number of patients excluded from general practice are included in the Results section (p.12). We acknowledge the confusion in the distribution of enrolment settings and consequently have opted to exclude data from all children enrolled at general practises (see response to Introduction comments above). All children presented to the emergency department of a single hospital and were either admitted or discharged home. Hospital admission was a key outcome of interest.
Methods
Settings and participants
How was influenza vaccination data collected? What proportion of self-report was verified? What proportion of children were fully vaccinated?Response Vaccination data were collected through parental...