2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects and relationships of grazing intensity on multiple ecosystem services in the Inner Mongolian steppe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grasslands in China cover roughly 40% of the country's total land area and account for approximately 6%–8% of the world's total area and 9%–16% of its C stocks (Fan et al., 2008; Tang et al., 2019). Grassland is also the largest terrestrial ecosystem in China, and thus critical to various ecological services, such as C sequestration, water conservation, and livestock production (Fan et al., 2019; Hao & He, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grasslands in China cover roughly 40% of the country's total land area and account for approximately 6%–8% of the world's total area and 9%–16% of its C stocks (Fan et al., 2008; Tang et al., 2019). Grassland is also the largest terrestrial ecosystem in China, and thus critical to various ecological services, such as C sequestration, water conservation, and livestock production (Fan et al., 2019; Hao & He, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the total value of ES in Lingqiu County remained above 2 billion yuan (Figure 2), indicating that a slight change in land use had no significant negative impact on the whole county's ecosystem. According to previous studies, the ecological lands could provide more indirect ES (regulating services, including GR, CR, EP, and HR; cultural services that include landscape esthetics) than non-ecological lands (Fan et al 2019;Chen, 2020). This indicates that Lingqiu possessed many potential ecosystem services, such as the regulating and cultural services of ecological land, which could be transformed into market values because of the availability of abundant natural resources.…”
Section: Ecosystem Service Values Changes Caused By Land Use Changementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The EST could range from negative infinity to positive infinity; a negative value indicates that the "food production" is dominant, while a positive value indicates that it is not dominant. The absolute EST value reflects the degree of the trade-offs levels (Fan et al 2019).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Trade-offs Of Ecosystem Service Based On Lulc (Land Use/land Cover)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within each site, three 1 × 1 m quadrats were randomly selected, and all living vascular plants in the quadrats were harvested by clipping to 1 cm stubble height, sorted to species, dried in an oven at 60 • C for 48 h and then weighed. After harvesting the aboveground portion, the belowground biomass was obtained by extracting a cylindrical soil core with a depth of 0-70 cm, and then soil samples were collected after removing the plant roots [55]. After washing the soil on the surface, the collected roots were dried in an oven at 60 • C to a constant weight.…”
Section: Measurement Of Ecosystem Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%