1964
DOI: 10.1080/00022470.1964.10468269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EffectsofHC/NOxRATIOSonIrradiated Auto Exhaust,Part II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several alkyl nitrates have also been identified as products in irradiated automobile exhaust. 11 The yields of alkyl nitrates are much lower than PAN yields, however, and can account for only a small percentage of the missing nitrogen. The possible presence of nitroolefins has been tested in irradiated propylene-NO2 mixtures, in irradiated auto exhaust, and in the atmosphere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several alkyl nitrates have also been identified as products in irradiated automobile exhaust. 11 The yields of alkyl nitrates are much lower than PAN yields, however, and can account for only a small percentage of the missing nitrogen. The possible presence of nitroolefins has been tested in irradiated propylene-NO2 mixtures, in irradiated auto exhaust, and in the atmosphere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The collection efficiencies for propionaldehyde in nitrogen were the same in both the original and the modied procedures; however, the collection efficiency for propionaldehyde in nitrogen in the first bubbler was only 65%. The 75% efficiencies obtained for acetaldehyde and for propionaldehyde and the 84% efficiency previously reported for formaldehyde (6) suggest that the reagent is not contributing appreciably to the solution of the aldehydes. The collection efficiencies are simiiar to those expected for physical solution in water.…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…After correction, the collection e5ciency is reduced to about 88%. The collection e5ciency for formaldehyde in the modified procedure is reported to be 84% (6). Values for collection efficiencies obtained in this work for acetaldehyde or propionaldehyde in air were about 75% in the first bubbler and 22% in the second of the three bubblers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 (Table III, Studies 1-3) and in an irradiated auto exhaust investigation 12 (Table III, Study 4) formaldehyde and acrolein were measured. Using the formaldehyde and acrolein concentrations in Table III, along with the eye irritation intensity parameters in Table II for these two irritants, it is estimated from these sets of results listed that acrolein could cause from 35 to 75% as much irritation as formaldehyde and on the average acrolein could cause about half as much irritation as formaldehyde.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%