2018
DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2018.1432913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of 1800 MHz RF-EMF exposure on DNA damage and cellular functions in primary cultured neurogenic cells

Abstract: Our data demonstrated that exposure to RF-EMF did not elicit DNA damage but inhibited the phagocytic ability of microglia and the axon branch length and branch number of cortical neurons.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the afore mentioned findings, some researchers have asserted that being subject to the non-ionizing radiation emitted by cellular phones has no undesired impacts on the testes and other biological tissues [17][18][19]. The contradictory reports on the effects on testes tissue exposed to non-ionizing radiation emitted from cellular phones determined in previous studies, along with the rapid increase of cellular phone usage, encouraged us to carry out this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Contrary to the afore mentioned findings, some researchers have asserted that being subject to the non-ionizing radiation emitted by cellular phones has no undesired impacts on the testes and other biological tissues [17][18][19]. The contradictory reports on the effects on testes tissue exposed to non-ionizing radiation emitted from cellular phones determined in previous studies, along with the rapid increase of cellular phone usage, encouraged us to carry out this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Immunofluorescence staining was carried out as previously described [31, 32]. Primary mouse anti-γH2AX antibody was used (Millipore, Temecula, CA; 1:1000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding to the debate is the lack of a characterized mechanism by which RF-EMR could affect biological systems. There is broadly, two opposing bodies of evidence, some that support the potential of RF-EMR to elicit a suite of detrimental effects in a variety of cell and tissues types including altered brain nerve branching ( 9 ), oxidative stress ( 10 – 14 ), genotoxic assault highlighted by micronuclei formation ( 15 , 16 ), and DNA fragmentation ( 13 , 17 , 18 ), while some find no elevation of oxidative stress ( 19 21 ) or DNA damage ( 22 24 ). The absence of a widely accepted mechanism of action that may account for the effects observed, complicates our ability to understand how RF-EMR interacts with specific cell types and to resolve the disparity in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%