2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2017.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of 2D seismic on the snow crab fishery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of the subsea cable installation on snow crab in Sydney Bight remains to be evaluated; however, the hybrid telemetry technology combined with a partnership-oriented approach among commercial harvesters, the electric utility, the regulator, and the OTN, enabled the collection of baseline data that will be essential to evaluating the potential effects of the project. Collaboration among industry, academia, and government has been demonstrated to increase the effectiveness of environmental science (Morris et al 2017;Rosenlund 2017). The benefits of such collaborations can be farreaching, including improved access to resources and data, broader expertise, increased trust and confidence in the science outcomes, and improved social license for industry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of the subsea cable installation on snow crab in Sydney Bight remains to be evaluated; however, the hybrid telemetry technology combined with a partnership-oriented approach among commercial harvesters, the electric utility, the regulator, and the OTN, enabled the collection of baseline data that will be essential to evaluating the potential effects of the project. Collaboration among industry, academia, and government has been demonstrated to increase the effectiveness of environmental science (Morris et al 2017;Rosenlund 2017). The benefits of such collaborations can be farreaching, including improved access to resources and data, broader expertise, increased trust and confidence in the science outcomes, and improved social license for industry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many studies showing the behavioural or physiological effects from sound exposure on fishes (Slabbekoorn et al, 2010;Cox et al, 2018;Popper and Hawkins, 2019), but assessing impact on free-ranging individuals from an anthropogenic source, such as a seismic survey, remains difficult and rarely performed (Pearson et al, 1992;Hassel et al, 2004;Fewtrell and McCauley, 2012;Bruce et al, 2018;Carroll et al, 2017;Morris et al, 2018;Morris et al, 2020;Slabbekoorn et al, 2019;Kok et al, 2021). The sounds from anthropogenic activities may reach fish by direct propagation through the water column or indirect propagation through the substrate (Hazelwood, 2012;Roberts and Elliot, 2017;Popper and Hawkins, 2019).…”
Section: Seismic Survey Exposure Conditions and Potential Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the expense and difficulty of chartering and tasking seismic vessels dedicated to experimental work and the confounding effects of studying species that are also the target of commercial fisheries and thus likely to be subject to depletion, irrespective of the potential effects of seismic surveys. Furthermore, given the distances sound may travel underwater, there is a major issue with the scale of experimental studies, which must encompass hundreds of square kilometers to monitor target species at places that might act as control locations (1,(3)(4)(5). This invariably requires the use of large vessels with high costs and complex logistics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%