2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a blend of essential oils and exogenous α-amylase in diets containing different roughage sources for finishing beef cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
18
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Velasco (2004) reported that exogenous α-amylases added at 2, 4, and 6 g/kg of the substrate (sorghum grain) were effective in improving IVDMD after 6 and 12 h; however, no effects were observed after 24 and 48 h. Similarly, Mora-Jaimes et al (2002) reported greater IVSD from sorghum grain treated with α-amylase from B. licheniformis compared with control. Several in vivo studies have shown potential of exogenous α-amylase in improving productivity of dairy and beef cattle ( Tricarico et al, 2005 ; Harrison and Tricarico, 2007 ; Klingerman et al, 2009 ; Gencoglu et al, 2010 ; Meschiatti et al, 2019 ; Toseti et al, 2020 ). In addition, α-amylase may improve animal productivity by increasing NDF digestibility regardless of its effects on starch degradability ( Bowman et al, 2002 ; Gencoglu et al, 2010 ) suggesting that enzymes may promote the growth of fiber degrading bacteria ( Vargas-Rodriguez et al, 2014 ) or that enzyme preparations may include fiber- and protein-degrading along with starch-degrading activities ( Adesogan et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Velasco (2004) reported that exogenous α-amylases added at 2, 4, and 6 g/kg of the substrate (sorghum grain) were effective in improving IVDMD after 6 and 12 h; however, no effects were observed after 24 and 48 h. Similarly, Mora-Jaimes et al (2002) reported greater IVSD from sorghum grain treated with α-amylase from B. licheniformis compared with control. Several in vivo studies have shown potential of exogenous α-amylase in improving productivity of dairy and beef cattle ( Tricarico et al, 2005 ; Harrison and Tricarico, 2007 ; Klingerman et al, 2009 ; Gencoglu et al, 2010 ; Meschiatti et al, 2019 ; Toseti et al, 2020 ). In addition, α-amylase may improve animal productivity by increasing NDF digestibility regardless of its effects on starch degradability ( Bowman et al, 2002 ; Gencoglu et al, 2010 ) suggesting that enzymes may promote the growth of fiber degrading bacteria ( Vargas-Rodriguez et al, 2014 ) or that enzyme preparations may include fiber- and protein-degrading along with starch-degrading activities ( Adesogan et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exogenous enzymes have been explored as alternatives associated with physical processing of corn in dairy and beef diets. Several studies have reported positive effects of α-amylase supplementation on dry matter intake (DMI), ruminal and total tract starch digestibility, feed efficiency, milk and meat production ( Tricarico et al, 2005 ; Harrison and Tricarico, 2007 ; Klingerman et al, 2009 ; Meschiatti et al, 2019 ; Toseti et al, 2020 ), although inconsistencies across trials have been observed ( Ferraretto et al, 2011 ; Weiss et al 2011 ; DiLorenzo et al, 2011 ). Similarly, exogenous proteases or blends of enzymes containing proteases have been evaluated as feed additives in total mixed ration (TMR) of both dairy and beef cows; however, studies have reported greater ( Eun and Beauchemin, 2005 ; Gado et al, 2009 ) or no effect ( Vera et al, 2012 ; Meschiatti et al, 2019 ) on animal performance when compared with control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O uso da associação entre a monensina e o OEs não faz sentido no atual contexto que busca a redução do uso de ionóforos com ação antibiótica e a utilização de enzimas não difere das respostas promovidas pelo uso de OEs. Toseti et al (2020) também avaliaram em um estudo com arranjo fatorial 2 x 2 o desempenho de 88 novilhos Nelore terminados com duas fontes de volumoso (silagem de milho ou bagaço de cana-deaçúcar) combinados ao uso de monensina de sódio (26 mg/kg de MS) ou a combinação de uma mistura de óleos essenciais (timol, eugenol, vanilina e limoneno) + α-amilase exógena (90 e 560 mg de produto comercial/kg MS, respectivamente). Os animais foram adaptados com inclusão crescente de concentrado por 21 dias e alimentados com dietas de terminação com alto concentrado (90%) por 87 dias.…”
Section: Efeito Da Substituição De Monensina Por Oes No Desempenho De Bovinos Confinadosunclassified
“…It acts bacteriostatically on Gram-positive ruminal bacteria but may leave residues in products of animal origin and result in microbial resistance 6 . Alternative additives have shown the potential to replace monensin, such as blends of essential oils associated with the exogenous enzyme α-amylase, which has led to demonstrable gains in performance and carcass weight, in addition to reducing hepatic abscesses and fecal starch in animals with high-starch diets 7 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%