2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02056.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a calcium phosphate coating on the osseointegration of endosseous implants in a rabbit model

Abstract: In conclusion, findings from the present study suggested that the Ca-P coating had no beneficial effect in improving bonding strength at the bone-implant interface either at 2, 4 and 9 weeks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After 12 weeks of healing, the HA-coated implants still possessed higher BIC than the controls, but without significant difference. This trend has been confirmed in several previous studies evaluating thin coating layers [24,25,26]. Our finding with regard to a stronger bone reaction to test implants is supported by our previous biomechanical study on similar test and control implants [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…After 12 weeks of healing, the HA-coated implants still possessed higher BIC than the controls, but without significant difference. This trend has been confirmed in several previous studies evaluating thin coating layers [24,25,26]. Our finding with regard to a stronger bone reaction to test implants is supported by our previous biomechanical study on similar test and control implants [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…25,28,29 The rabbit tibia is an accepted animal model for biomaterial research and technically favorable. 33 The biocompatibility of the SMBM material was proved in an earlier study and was reproducible in this experiment. The Alfa Gate dental implants are advantageous for bony healing due to their calcium phosphate coating.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The effects of surface modification with calcium phosphate have received mixed reviews in the literature. Some research groups show positive effects of these coatings on bone regeneration and the mechanical properties of the coated biomaterials , whereas others show no beneficial effects of the coating with respect to bone regeneration (Ekholm et al 2005;Fontana et al 2011). It should be noted, however, that most of the defects treated in the aforementioned studies were small bone defects (not critical-sized, thereby able to heal unassisted) or were studies to demonstrate the effects of surface modification on implant ingrowth (Fontana et al 2011;Mihalko et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%