2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10597-018-0345-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a community intervention program for dementia on mental health: the importance of secondary caregivers in promoting positive aspects and reducing strain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
12
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Training and support programmes have been demonstrated to help reduce the psychological distress in informal caregivers of people with dementia. Several studies on the efficacy of multicomponent interventions including skills training, psychoeducation, techniques for self-care, changes in the caregiver’s setting, among others, have presented more robust results showing favourable effects of such interventions on caregiver burden, mental health, subjective well-being, skills/knowledge, and self-efficacy (Gilhooly et al., 2016; Parker et al., 2008; Paúl et al., 2019; Selwood et al., 2007; Sörensen et al., 2002). Despite evidence showing a beneficial effect of these interventions on several caregiver outcomes, the face-to-face format in which they are typically implemented have been documented to pose situational barriers to their access (Abreu et al., 2015; Egan & Pot, 2016; WHO, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Training and support programmes have been demonstrated to help reduce the psychological distress in informal caregivers of people with dementia. Several studies on the efficacy of multicomponent interventions including skills training, psychoeducation, techniques for self-care, changes in the caregiver’s setting, among others, have presented more robust results showing favourable effects of such interventions on caregiver burden, mental health, subjective well-being, skills/knowledge, and self-efficacy (Gilhooly et al., 2016; Parker et al., 2008; Paúl et al., 2019; Selwood et al., 2007; Sörensen et al., 2002). Despite evidence showing a beneficial effect of these interventions on several caregiver outcomes, the face-to-face format in which they are typically implemented have been documented to pose situational barriers to their access (Abreu et al., 2015; Egan & Pot, 2016; WHO, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, support provision to informal dementia caregivers is either absent or depends on scattered initiatives. In Portugal, there are some good examples of such initiatives, but those usually rely on short and hardly renewable funded projects (Figueiredo et al., 2012; Paúl et al., 2019; Sousa et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not a new approach, the use of community interventions to address a wide range of health problems has grown internationally in recent years. Examples of the diversity of community interventions include efforts to strengthen social networks among older adults in Japan ( Harada et al, 2017 ), address mental health in low- and middle-income countries ( Kohrt et al, 2018 ), and support caregivers of individuals living with dementia ( Paúl, Teixeira, Duarte, Pires, & Ribeiro, 2019 ). Expanding community intervention work to integrate how individuals experience their communities, such as through neighborhood and community perceptions, as well as the mediating effects of biological dysregulation may lead to more effective interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hasil studi Legget et al, juga menunjukkan skor PAC yang lebih tinggi pada caregiver yang mengikuti program pelatihan caregiver, namun hasil ini signifikan hanya pada caregiver laki-laki (B = 0.19, β = 0.11, SE = 0.08, p = .02) [10]. Pada hasil terlihat bahwa terdapat peningkatan skor PAC sebanyak 0.19 (dengan rentang skala = 0-2) [21].…”
Section: Dukungan Formalunclassified
“…Perbedaan etnis/ ras dan budaya menunjukkan keragaman sumber daya caregiver, penggunaan strategi koping, serta tingkat stressor, hal tersebut seringkali mempengaruhi pengalaman caregiver dan peran mereka dalam merawat ODD [19]. Menurut studi Pope, Baldwin and Lee dan Paúl et al, caregiver dengan usia yang lebih muda memiliki skor PAC lebih tinggi serta mengalami beberapa hal positif selama merawat ODD, antara lain penguatan hubungan keluarga, pengembangan karakter, kepuasan pribadi dalam perawatan yang diberikan, dan manfaat materi, jika dibandingkan dengan caregiver yang lebih tua [21,19].…”
Section: Kualitas Hidup Caregiverunclassified